UK workers ‘hide AI use and fear its social implications’

-

One third of more than 1,500 British workers aged 16 to 75 said they did not tell bosses or senior colleagues that they use AI to aid their work. Just 13 percent said they openly discuss AI use with senior staff. Around one in four believe that their co‑workers would question their ability to perform roles if they admitted using AI.

More than half of those surveyed believe that AI threatens the social structure. Sixty‑three percent said AI is not a good substitute for human interaction while only seventeen percent said it was.

Uncertainty about employer guidance, stigma

The polling suggests many employees feel unclear about how AI should be used in workplaces. Almost half reported that their employers do not provide formal guidelines for AI use. Some respondents said they fear stigma or judgement if colleagues believe they are relying too heavily on automated tools.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Prof Keiichi Nakata of Henley Business School, whose work was also referenced, said that people were more comfortable discussing AI than a year earlier, but stigma remained.

“Psychologically, if you are confident with your work and your expertise you can confidently talk about your engagement with AI, whereas if you feel it might be doing a better job than you are or you feel that you will be judged as not good enough or worse than AI, you might try to hide that or avoid talking about it,” he said.

Leaders call for evaluation and trust

Gaia Marcus, director of research body the Ada Lovelace Institute, described the findings as a warning. She said the large minority of people who did not disclose AI use showed “potential for a large trust gap to emerge between government’s appetite for economy‑wide AI adoption and the public sense that AI might not be beneficial to them or to the fabric of society”.

Marcus also noted that so far there was no strong evidence that these generative AI tools were increasing productivity significantly. She said people must remain in control of how the tools are used.

What the survey reveals about worker belief

The polling offered a snapshot of worker sentiment, revealing widespread concerns about AI’s impact on jobs, social dynamics and personal credibility:

  • One third avoid disclosing AI use to senior staff
  • Nearly half believe AI will harm social structure
  • Most are sceptical that AI can replace human interaction
  • Fear of being judged or appearing less competent is common among those who use AI

Implications for employers

The survey reveals workplaces where AI is adopted but social norms, expectations and fears lean heavily towards caution. HR departments and company leaders may need to address several issues in light of the findings:

Clear AI policies
Employers should provide explicit guidance on acceptable AI usage. Clarity over when and how AI tools should be used could reduce anxiety among employees.

Open communication culture
Encouraging open discussion about AI tools without fear of judgement could help reduce stigma. Creating forums or spaces for workers to share experiences may foster trust.

Training and oversight
Training programmes should include not only how to use AI tools but also potential ethical, social and interpersonal implications. Oversight may help prevent misuse or overreliance.

Balancing human interaction
As many workers believe human interaction cannot be replaced by AI, employers might preserve or redesign aspects of work that rely on human contact.

Examining social outcomes
Public policymakers may need to consider not just productivity but also how AI integration affects social fabric, trust, inclusion and workers’ wellbeing.

Starmer has said that he wants to integrate AI into many areas of British industry. “Artificial intelligence will drive incredible change in our country. From teachers personalising lessons, to supporting small businesses with their record-keeping, to speeding up planning applications, it has the potential to transform the lives of working people,” he said in January.

But as the state looks to accelerate AI adoption, this survey suggests a significant portion of the workforce remains wary. Without addressing concerns over transparency, judgement and impact on social relations, experts say workers may be reluctant to embrace AI fully.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Alan Bourne: Are people analytics and psychometrics testing essential to recruitment?

The army were the first to use psychometrics principles for recruitment purposes.

Faye Holland: Employee Engagement – Rhetoric or reality?

There’s no denying that the phrase ‘employee engagement’ is...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you