HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Shared parental leave uptake remains limited among UK fathers, figures show

-

That’s according to research by employment law firm Littler. Shared Parental Leave (SPL) allows eligible parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay following the birth of a child. The Government scheme enables mothers to transfer part of their maternity leave to their partner, offering families flexibility in how they manage childcare and time off work.

Despite these provisions, take-up has remained low, prompting a formal Government review of parental leave policies. The review follows concerns raised by the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, which highlighted “persistently low levels of take up” that have failed to drive significant change in fathers’ use of leave.

Employment law specialists and policy commentators point to structural and practical barriers that continue to deter fathers from participating in the scheme at scale.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Lack of awareness and financial concerns limit uptake

Ben Rouse, Associate at Littler, said awareness remains a significant hurdle. “The number of men taking advantage of the Shared Parental Leave scheme is unfortunately still very low. We’re seeing marginal increases in the use of shared parental leave but not the step change that it was hoped this scheme would create.”

He added, “It is unclear exactly why uptake is so low. One of the main reasons is thought to be lack of awareness. Not enough eligible men are aware of the scheme or that they are eligible to use it.”

Cost is another factor that may disincentivise participation. While the Government offers Statutory Shared Parental Pay as part of the scheme, this often does not match the enhanced maternity pay provided by many employers. As a result, families may find themselves worse off financially if they opt to share leave.

“Many couples find it difficult to make ends meet where the mother gives up her maternity leave pay for their partner to take Shared Parental Leave,” Rouse said. “Maternity Leave pay is often enhanced by employers.”

Bureaucracy may be a deterrent for parents and employers

Beyond financial concerns, the complexity of the system is also cited as a barrier. Rouse noted that “many are likely to be put off by the bureaucracy of the scheme. Both parents can claim their respective statutory parental leaves with relative ease, but SPL creates an extra level of complexity and paperwork.”

This administrative burden may also affect employers, especially smaller organisations unfamiliar with the requirements of SPL. Navigating the rules, coordinating leave schedules and calculating entitlements can present logistical challenges, making it less likely for employers to encourage uptake proactively.

However, some HR professionals argue that, with proper support, SPL could be a valuable part of a more inclusive workplace strategy.

The ongoing Government review of parental leave has opened the door for potential reform. Advocacy groups and professional bodies are urging policymakers to simplify the scheme, increase funding and provide clearer information to both employers and employees.

Rouse said, “It’s nevertheless encouraging to see movement in the right direction. The scheme has the potential to reduce the childcare burden on mothers and support their return to work.

“Shared Parental Leave can be good for both employees and employers. It provides greater flexibility for working parents and ultimately contributes to more inclusive working environments. This can improve employee satisfaction and productivity.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Matt Fryer: Five common mistakes made in IR35 mock audits

"Businesses should be taking time to review their flexible workforce engagements and ensuring that ongoing staff training is in place, with a focus on what their responsibilities are under the legislation".

Peter Linas: How recruiters can engage millennials and post-millennials

What are the reasons why millennials and post-millennials are seemingly the most challenging to recruit? Peter Linas argues that, despite the common stereotype that people this age would be easier to reach through their use of tech, this could be simultaneously part of the problem.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you