Shared parental leave uptake remains limited among UK fathers, figures show

-

That’s according to research by employment law firm Littler. Shared Parental Leave (SPL) allows eligible parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay following the birth of a child. The Government scheme enables mothers to transfer part of their maternity leave to their partner, offering families flexibility in how they manage childcare and time off work.

Despite these provisions, take-up has remained low, prompting a formal Government review of parental leave policies. The review follows concerns raised by the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, which highlighted “persistently low levels of take up” that have failed to drive significant change in fathers’ use of leave.

Employment law specialists and policy commentators point to structural and practical barriers that continue to deter fathers from participating in the scheme at scale.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Lack of awareness and financial concerns limit uptake

Ben Rouse, Associate at Littler, said awareness remains a significant hurdle. “The number of men taking advantage of the Shared Parental Leave scheme is unfortunately still very low. We’re seeing marginal increases in the use of shared parental leave but not the step change that it was hoped this scheme would create.”

He added, “It is unclear exactly why uptake is so low. One of the main reasons is thought to be lack of awareness. Not enough eligible men are aware of the scheme or that they are eligible to use it.”

Cost is another factor that may disincentivise participation. While the Government offers Statutory Shared Parental Pay as part of the scheme, this often does not match the enhanced maternity pay provided by many employers. As a result, families may find themselves worse off financially if they opt to share leave.

“Many couples find it difficult to make ends meet where the mother gives up her maternity leave pay for their partner to take Shared Parental Leave,” Rouse said. “Maternity Leave pay is often enhanced by employers.”

Bureaucracy may be a deterrent for parents and employers

Beyond financial concerns, the complexity of the system is also cited as a barrier. Rouse noted that “many are likely to be put off by the bureaucracy of the scheme. Both parents can claim their respective statutory parental leaves with relative ease, but SPL creates an extra level of complexity and paperwork.”

This administrative burden may also affect employers, especially smaller organisations unfamiliar with the requirements of SPL. Navigating the rules, coordinating leave schedules and calculating entitlements can present logistical challenges, making it less likely for employers to encourage uptake proactively.

However, some HR professionals argue that, with proper support, SPL could be a valuable part of a more inclusive workplace strategy.

The ongoing Government review of parental leave has opened the door for potential reform. Advocacy groups and professional bodies are urging policymakers to simplify the scheme, increase funding and provide clearer information to both employers and employees.

Rouse said, “It’s nevertheless encouraging to see movement in the right direction. The scheme has the potential to reduce the childcare burden on mothers and support their return to work.

“Shared Parental Leave can be good for both employees and employers. It provides greater flexibility for working parents and ultimately contributes to more inclusive working environments. This can improve employee satisfaction and productivity.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Justine Woolf: Will we see pay transparency?

It is difficult to establish equal pay between genders without knowing what everyone earns. Could pay transparency lead to equality?

JP Caffery: The “unexpected costs” in global agency management

"Managing existing or new agency relationships can be a complex and challenging part of the talent acquisition process..."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you