Shared parental leave uptake remains limited among UK fathers, figures show

-

That’s according to research by employment law firm Littler. Shared Parental Leave (SPL) allows eligible parents to share up to 50 weeks of leave and 37 weeks of pay following the birth of a child. The Government scheme enables mothers to transfer part of their maternity leave to their partner, offering families flexibility in how they manage childcare and time off work.

Despite these provisions, take-up has remained low, prompting a formal Government review of parental leave policies. The review follows concerns raised by the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee, which highlighted “persistently low levels of take up” that have failed to drive significant change in fathers’ use of leave.

Employment law specialists and policy commentators point to structural and practical barriers that continue to deter fathers from participating in the scheme at scale.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Lack of awareness and financial concerns limit uptake

Ben Rouse, Associate at Littler, said awareness remains a significant hurdle. “The number of men taking advantage of the Shared Parental Leave scheme is unfortunately still very low. We’re seeing marginal increases in the use of shared parental leave but not the step change that it was hoped this scheme would create.”

He added, “It is unclear exactly why uptake is so low. One of the main reasons is thought to be lack of awareness. Not enough eligible men are aware of the scheme or that they are eligible to use it.”

Cost is another factor that may disincentivise participation. While the Government offers Statutory Shared Parental Pay as part of the scheme, this often does not match the enhanced maternity pay provided by many employers. As a result, families may find themselves worse off financially if they opt to share leave.

“Many couples find it difficult to make ends meet where the mother gives up her maternity leave pay for their partner to take Shared Parental Leave,” Rouse said. “Maternity Leave pay is often enhanced by employers.”

Bureaucracy may be a deterrent for parents and employers

Beyond financial concerns, the complexity of the system is also cited as a barrier. Rouse noted that “many are likely to be put off by the bureaucracy of the scheme. Both parents can claim their respective statutory parental leaves with relative ease, but SPL creates an extra level of complexity and paperwork.”

This administrative burden may also affect employers, especially smaller organisations unfamiliar with the requirements of SPL. Navigating the rules, coordinating leave schedules and calculating entitlements can present logistical challenges, making it less likely for employers to encourage uptake proactively.

However, some HR professionals argue that, with proper support, SPL could be a valuable part of a more inclusive workplace strategy.

The ongoing Government review of parental leave has opened the door for potential reform. Advocacy groups and professional bodies are urging policymakers to simplify the scheme, increase funding and provide clearer information to both employers and employees.

Rouse said, “It’s nevertheless encouraging to see movement in the right direction. The scheme has the potential to reduce the childcare burden on mothers and support their return to work.

“Shared Parental Leave can be good for both employees and employers. It provides greater flexibility for working parents and ultimately contributes to more inclusive working environments. This can improve employee satisfaction and productivity.”

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Tom Kerr Williams: Managing strike action

Most employers look to avoid industrial strike action wherever possible, but there comes a time in every unionised employer’s existence where such action is threatened.

Are gender stereotypes being reinforced in AI?

Virtual assistants such as Siri, Alexa, and Cortana are making our lives easier.  However, the rise of AI with distinct personalities, voices, and physical forms is not as benign as it might seem.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you