Government confirms plans to scrap default retirement age

-

The Government has confirmed the phasing out the default retirement age of 65 by the end of September. Retirement at age 65 is currently a legitimate reason for the dismissal of an employee providing it forms the genuine reason for dismissal and appropriate notice is given. However, from 1 October, compulsory retirement, regardless of age, will be unlawful age discrimination and potential unfair dismissal unless employers can justify their reasons as a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”.

Owen Warnock, Partner at international law firm, Eversheds commented: “Today’s announcement was not unexpected, but many employers who apply the default retirement age had voiced strong concern over the short amount of time they have to adapt to the changes since the last date for giving six months’ notice of retirement under the current procedures is 30 March 2011. Retirements which have already been notified under the existing retirement procedures but were not intended to take effect until after 1 October will also fall under the new rules and will need either to be reversed or to be justified.

“If they have not already done so, it is essential that employers review their retirement arrangements as soon as possible. Some may consider retaining a compulsory retirement age for particular occupational groups, for example to aid workforce planning or for health and safety reasons, but they will need to be able to show that the retirement age can be justified if they are to defend Employment Tribunal claims alleging this to be discriminatory. This will be no easy task and Tribunals will scrutinize whether there would be other less discriminatory ways of, for example, ensuring effective workforce planning or protection health and safety. Case law around this will obviously begin to develop in due course but the hurdle of justification is not insignificant.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Many employers will abandon the concept of compulsory retirement; and the Government hopes that this will challenge “myths about older people’s capabilities”. Business groups had lobbied for the removal of a default retirement age to be accompanied by a simplification of the law about age-related capability dismissals, but the Government has rejected the need for such a change. Instead, it asked ACAS to provide employer guidance on managing without the default retirement age, and, in particular, managing poor performance. Two key messages emerge from the guidance on poor performance: not to stereotype older workers as poorer performers and to address poor performance in all workers consistently and fairly. Consequently, employers should consider refreshing and improving performance management processes, and the willingness of managers to operate them, so that concerns about under-performance with any age can be fairly addressed.

“Abandoning compulsory retirement will necessitate employers finding out what plans employees have for their retirement so that both parties can prepare for the transition. The ACAS guidance recommends discussing future plans with all employees (not just older employees) as part of a regular personal development or appraisal system, on an annual basis as a minimum. While many employers already conduct such performance reviews, existing discussions may not currently involve medium and longer term plans and this will need to change .

“There is some good news in relation to insured benefits such as private medical insurance and permanent health insurance. The cost of these increases in line with the age of employees. The government has acknowledged that, when the default retirement age is abolished, the cost to employers of providing such benefits will increase, and, if no action were taken, could lead some to withdraw such benefits for all employees. Similarly where employers operate a flexible benefit scheme, it is not always possible for older workers to obtain the same insurance benefits or they have to pay a greater element of the flexible benefit package, due to the terms applied by insurance companies. To avoid these issues, the Government will introduce an exemption from the principle of equal treatment on the grounds of age where group risk insured benefits are provided on behalf of an employer. The exemption will mean that this type of insured benefit can be withdrawn from employees aged 65 and above (though this age will rise in line with the state pension age). “

Latest news

Targeted hiring grants beat tax cuts in tackling youth jobs crisis, report says

Expanding targeted hiring schemes would be a more cost-effective way to tackle youth unemployment than broad tax cuts, a report says.

Bar Huberman: Inclusion shouldn’t stop when Pride Month ends

Despite workplaces championing Pride Month, evidence shows that many LGBTQ+ employees continue to experience discrimination at work.

‘Most employers’ still unprepared for employment law overhaul

Many organisations are still preparing for major changes under the Employment Rights Act, with unfair dismissal reforms causing the greatest concern.

Kate Dearden on the promise of workplace reform

“If we do get it right, it will be transformational for people; it will absolutely change their lives."
- Advertisement -

Kevin Chan: Escaping the artificial AI talent crisis

The application of AI to traditional business processes has led to a massive shake-up of the employment market.

University no longer pays for everyone as employers back apprenticeships

Lifetime returns from higher education are becoming more uneven as employers place growing value on vocational routes into work.

Must read

Anna Gamal: Mind the Gap – How Remote Working Can Overcome the Skills Shortage

The skills shortage in the UK is a growing...

John Deacon: Pensions or housing – it shouldn’t have to be a choice

How can an employer help their workers meet their financial goals?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you