Employees who distrust their leaders are nine times more likely to consider leaving

-

Employees who distrust their leaders are nine times more likely to consider leaving and 15 times more likely to report unreasonable work stress, according to the study which also unveils how leaders can win the trust of employees –

28 percent of employees actively distrust the senior leaders in their organisation, according to a new study which exposes the dire consequences of distrust on staff retention, employee well-being and organisational performance.

The Kenexa High Performance Institute, a division of Kenexa (NASDAQ: KNXA), a global provider of business solutions for human resources, asked 10,000 employees whether they trusted the senior leaders of their organisation. 48 percent said yes, 28 percent said no and 24 percent were undecided.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

A new report on the study, called Trust Matters, reveals the three fundamental behaviours that constitute trust, the organisational and individual consequences of distrust and what leaders can do to gain the trust of employees.

“Trust is about relying on and having confidence in the actions of another person,” said Dr Rena Rasch, research manager at the Kenexa High Performance Institute and author of the report. “Using odds-ratio calculations, we can predict that employees who distrust their leaders are nine times more likely to seriously consider leaving their organisation. They’re also 15 times more likely to report unreasonable work stress and seven times more likely to feel mentally and physically unwell. Where a high level of distrust exists, HR practitioners should intervene to avoid a damaging impact on retention, well-being and organisational performance.”

According to the report, the three behaviours that primarily affect whether employees trust or distrust their leaders are: integrity (are they honest?), benevolence (do they care about me?) and competence (can they do their job?).

“To gain the trust of employees, and to reap the rewards of a more engaged workforce, senior leaders need to be honest, benevolent and competent and they have to be seen to be so,” said Dr Rasch. “Leaders can achieve this by listening to employees, empathising with them, being true to their word and treating people fairly. One of the easiest ways to cultivate employee trust is to start trusting your employees.”

The report reveals that employees are twice as likely to trust their senior leaders if the organisation has published a mission statement, conducted an employee opinion survey, sponsored a quality improvement initiative, gathered customer satisfaction feedback, conducted yearly performance reviews or cross-trained employees.

“The more of these best practices that the organisation engages in, the greater the level of employee trust in the leadership,”said Dr Rasch. “Improving levels of trust is not only likely to save money on hiring new staff, it may also reduce sickness and absence costs.”

When analysing whether certain groups of employees tend to trust their leaders more or less than others, the report finds no significant difference between men and women. However, the percentage of people who trust their leaders seems to decline with age. Employees in their twenties are twice as likely to trust their leaders as employees in their forties or fifties. Upper and mid-level managers trust their leaders by 15 percentage points more than rank-and-file employees.

“Knowing which employees are generally less trusting can help HR practitioners to target their interventions on the most at-risk groups,” said Dr Rasch.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Sandra Porter: Has HR forgotten to put its own oxygen mask on first?

The HR profession is on the brink of well-deserved greatness, writes Sandra Porter.  From the Covid-19 cloud there is the potential silver lining of a permanent seat in organisations’ ‘war rooms’.

Caroline Essex: sickness absence and secret surveillance

Most employers will have occasions when they have reason...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you