Companies risk hefty data breach fines by failing to destroy candidates’ CVs

-

HR managers and recruiters are putting their employers at risk of penalties of up to £17.5 million (€20 million) under imminent data protection regulations by failing to destroy sensitive data contained within job applicants’ CVs.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force on 25 May, will apply to all companies that process personal data of European Union citizens.

CVs and application forms often reveal personal data about the subject including their home address, middle names and national insurance number — and sometimes even sensitive information, such as their physical or mental health condition and previous criminal convictions.

And since it’s customary for HR managers to print the CVs of prospective employees prior to interviewing them, they’re risking serious data breaches — and therefore hefty fines — unless they properly destroy the documents afterwards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This comes after identity fraud, particularly against young people, is reported to have risen by 30% and Facebook finds itself at the centre of a worldwide data breach scandal.

Organisations in breach of GDPR, which includes not having a person’s consent to process their data, can be fined up to 4% of their annual turnover, or €20 million (£17.5 million) — whichever is greater.

In fact, job candidates — and any data subjects — will have six rights under the new legislation: right of access, whereby they can request to be informed about what will be done with their data; right to rectification, meaning they can correct or update any data that’s held on file; and right to erasure, which allows them to have their data removed from a database at any time.

Prospective employees will also have the right to restriction of processing, whereby they can request their data is suspended from being processed in a database, the right to export all their data from files, and the right to object to their data being processed indefinitely.

Jonathan Richardson, managing director at secure shredding specialist Russell Richardson, said: “Ahead of the enforcement of GDPR, and in light of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, many businesses are rightfully focusing on cleaning up their electronic databases to remove the risk of breaches. But it’s equally important that they destroy hard copies of sensitive and personal data — a perfect example of which is printed CVs, which are often cast aside or disposed of insecurely after job interviews.”

Many businesses are beginning to outsource the shredding of confidential and sensitive documents for this reason. Although in-house office shredders are common, they typically use the ‘strip-cut’ method which produces ribbon-like strips of paper. In the wrong hands, waste paper shredded in this way can still be read and reassembled, meaning the data subject could still be at risk of identity fraud.

“Employing a regular shredding service removes this risk and gives businesses of all sizes peace of mind that they’re adhering to the new laws,” Jonathan added. “The size of the fines they’re avoiding by securely destroying confidential information far outweighs the cost of such services.

“And while recruiters often tell unsuccessful candidates: ‘We’ll keep your details on file,’ in future they’d be wise to rephrase this message.”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Amelia Brand: Considering the legalities of single-sex toilets in the workplace

Are workplaces becoming ‘woke-places’? And, how should employers navigate trans rights within the workplace?

Zee Hussain: Employee complaints during a heatwave – and how to deal with them

The current heatwave has resulted in a rise in complaints amongst staff about working conditions. Do they have a point? Zee Hussain, Partner and Head of the Employment at Colemans-ctts, offers some guidance to employers on employee rights during soaring temperatures, in the form of responses to some of the most common employee complaints.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you