£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

-

The opportunity comes at a time when organisations are facing sustained cost pressures, with many looking for ways to manage rising wage bills and tax changes without cutting benefits.

A new analysis from BDO, an accountancy and business advisory firm, suggests that millions of employees are not yet using salary sacrifice arrangements, leaving significant savings on the table for both employers and staff.

Millions not using salary sacrifice schemes

The government estimates that 7.7 million people currently contribute to pensions through salary sacrifice, out of 18.6 million private sector workers enrolled in workplace pension schemes.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

That leaves almost 11 million employees who are not currently benefiting from the arrangement.

BDO said that, based on a conservative assessment of contributions, employers could save up to £10bn per year in National Insurance contributions if uptake increases, while employees could collectively save around £4.5bn annually.

Salary sacrifice allows employees to exchange part of their gross salary for employer pension contributions. Because the taxable salary is reduced, both employer and employee National Insurance contributions fall, while pension contributions continue to receive income tax relief.

The scale of potential savings becomes more significant at organisational level. Based on average salary assumptions of £39,000, combined National Insurance savings across the next three tax years could reach £439,000 for a business with 500 employees, rising to £1.3m for employers with 1,500 staff.

Reform deadline puts pressure on employers to act

The window for maximising the savings is time-limited. At the Autumn Budget in November 2025, the government confirmed that from April 2029, National Insurance relief on pension contributions made through salary sacrifice will be capped at £2,000.

The move forms part of a wider effort to reduce the cost of tax reliefs and reshape how pension incentives are delivered.

Steve Talbot, an employment tax partner at BDO, said employers still had time to benefit from the current system before the rules change. “At a time when employers are facing numerous cost pressures, offering a salary sacrifice arrangement to employees now could still lead to significant savings. And those employers that already offer it could choose to encourage more of their employees to take part.”

“Employers also need to plan ahead and prepare for the changes due in April 2029. Starting this process sooner rather than later should give sufficient time to model changes and consider how they might want to flex their benefit packages,” he said.

Talbot said the impact on staff would depend on earnings and contribution levels. “For employees, the reforms in April 2029 will have a variable impact. A typical employee earning an average of £39k per year and making a 5% pension contribution won’t be impacted. However, someone earning above this level and making higher contributions will be likely to be affected.”

Practical and compliance considerations remain

While salary sacrifice schemes are widely used, they are not suitable for all employees. Employers must ensure that any arrangement does not reduce pay below National Minimum Wage thresholds, which can limit participation for lower-paid workers.

There are also administrative and communication challenges. Expanding salary sacrifice requires clear explanation to employees, as well as updates to payroll systems and employment contracts.

Despite these considerations, experts say the financial case is likely to attract attention from employers seeking alternatives to more disruptive cost-cutting measures such as hiring freezes or redundancies.

With the 2029 deadline approaching, the analysis suggests that salary sacrifice could play a more prominent role in how organisations manage both pension provision and employment costs in the coming years.

Managing Editor at Black | Website

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Isabel Naidoo: The tip of the HR iceberg: A look at the landscape

I love HR. I know that’s pretty contentious, after all there seems to be a proliferation of HR bashing happening on a constant basis (at least in my twitter newsfeed!).

Even ‘nasty’ women are 170 years away from economic equality with men

Gender stereotypes like this belong in the dark ages and should have no place in modern day society. Girls' schools invest a lot of time and effort in teaching girls how to be assertive, confident and resilient. Is this "nasty women" message one we really want to be giving our daughters, or re-enforcing to our sons?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you