HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

The most common lies on CVs – and why candidates tell them

-

There is a rising trend of job seekers in the UK embellishing their CVs to meet evolving job requirements, particularly in software and AI-related skills.

As technology continues to reshape the workplace, candidates are increasingly fabricating details to appear more qualified and competitive, according to a recent survey by Capital on Tap.

Advances in technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), are outpacing employee skill development. According to report from people development company Lepaya, 82 percent of employees feel workplace demands are evolving faster than their skills.

In this landscape, it’s no great surprise that many job seekers are misrepresenting their software expertise and other qualifications in response to shifting job market demands. The Capital on Tap report found that many candidates stretch the truth on their CVs in various other areas, including reasons for leaving previous jobs, employment dates, salaries, and prior responsibilities.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

According to the findings, 55 percent of lies on CVs are motivated by the desire to meet specific job requirements, while 33 percent are made to increase the likelihood of advancing to the next stage of the hiring process. Additionally, 10 percent of candidates lie to stand out in a competitive job market.

Common CV Lies

The survey revealed that one of the most common areas of dishonesty is the reason for leaving previous roles. Nine percent of respondents admitted to lying about this, with many reframing negative departures as opportunities to “seek new challenges” to avoid raising concerns with prospective employers.

Employment dates are another frequent target for manipulation. Seven percent of respondents acknowledged altering their dates of employment to mask gaps or extend the perceived duration of previous roles. Notably, 28 percent said they would consider this tactic in the future.

Lying about previous salaries is also prevalent, with 7 percent of respondents admitting to inflating their past earnings. Younger candidates, particularly those aged 25-34, are the most likely to employ this tactic, with 18 percent in this age group saying they would exaggerate their salary to secure better pay in a new role.

Fabrication of prior job responsibilities is another issue, with candidates overstating their contributions or involvement in tasks to appear more experienced.

Detecting Dishonesty

The survey revealed that many false claims on CVs go undetected by employers. For example, 98 percent of candidates who lied about their GCSE results reported that the deception went unnoticed, likely because such qualifications are often overlooked in favour of more recent achievements.

Similarly, 97 percent of candidates who exaggerated their job titles were not caught. Common examples include inflating a “data input” role to a “data engineer” position.

Fay Sumner, Head of People at Capital on Tap, recommends verifying employment history through references and LinkedIn profiles to cross-check dates and job titles. Gaps or inconsistencies should prompt further investigation. Sumner also advised asking candidates specific questions about their past roles during interviews.

“When discussing a candidate’s past role, asking for specific examples of their responsibilities and achievements can reveal whether they’re being truthful. Candidates who are genuine will be able to provide clear and detailed examples whilst those who have fabricated information may struggle,” Sumner said.

Incorporating skills assessments in the hiring process can also help employers confirm whether a candidate’s abilities match the claims on their CV. For example, practical tests can verify proficiency in software tools or technical skills that are critical for the role.

Lastly, employers should be cautious of overused buzzwords like “dynamic leader” or “results-driven”.

“Asking candidates to give concrete evidence of how they applied these skills in their previous role can help you determine if their claims are based on authentic experience,” Sumner said.

Alessandra Pacelli is a journalist and author contributing to HRreview, an HR news and opinion publication, where she covers topics including labour market trends, employment costs, and workplace issues. She is a journalism graduate and self-described lifelong dog lover who has also written for Dogs Today magazine since 2014.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Tom Arey: HR priorities in 2026? People!

Happy New Year! An era of new hope and opportunities, yet for many HR leaders, the challenges remain as pressing as ever.

Elizabeth Hunt: The year ahead in graduate recruitment

While 2015 brought some very positive stories to the graduate recruitment market, it was also a year of change. A 13.2 percent increase in graduate vacancies and 3.7 percent rise in graduate starting salaries showed growth in the right direction, with more increases on the horizon for 2016.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you