HRreview Header

Hiring intentions fall to lowest point since the pandemic, report finds

-

The report noted growing concern across sectors, especially retail and education, as businesses respond to rising employment costs and global instability.

The survey reveals that the net employment balance – the difference between employers expecting to increase versus decrease staff numbers over the next three months – has dropped from +13 last quarter to +8. This is the lowest level recorded outside of the pandemic since the measure was introduced in 2014.

The report also shows that confidence has slipped into negative territory within the public sector, where the net employment balance moved from +3 to -4. In the private sector, it declined from +16 to +11. The retail sector has been particularly affected, with a drop from +23 in Autumn 2024 to -19 this quarter. Only 10 percent of retail employers now expect staffing increases, while 30 percent expect reductions.

The education sector is also under pressure. In compulsory education, the net balance is now -13, and in non-compulsory education – including vocational and higher education – it has fallen to -7. Overall, 61 percent of employers plan to recruit in the coming three months, a decline from 64 percent in the previous quarter and 67 percent in Autumn 2024.

Hiring intentions weakest among big private sector employers

The fall in expected staff increases is most pronounced among large private sector employers. Last quarter, 39 percent of employers in the private sector expected staffing levels to rise. This has now dropped to 32 percent. The CIPD reports that one in four employers (24%) are planning redundancies over the next three months, consistent with the previous quarter but above the 21 percent recorded last Autumn.

The CIPD is urging the government to consult employers and develop a clear implementation plan for the Employment Rights Bill, warning that uncertainty around the legislation may be compounding existing pressures on recruitment and investment.

James Cockett, senior labour market economist at the CIPD, said, “From April, employers across the UK have begun to feel the full effect of increases to National Insurance Contributions and the National Living Wage outlined in last year’s budget. They’re also looking at the potential impact of the Employment Rights Bill on employments costs and plans, and this comes at a time of global uncertainty. Employer confidence is low which is being reflected in their hiring plans.”

He added that the Employment Rights Bill is landing in “a fundamentally different landscape” to the one expected when it was fist conceived as part of the Labour manifesto.

“It was always going to be a huge change for employers but they’re operating in an even more complex world now,” Cockett said. “It’s vital the government works closely with employers to balance the very real risk of reductions in investment in people, training and technology with their desire to reduce poor employment practice. The government can address employer nerves around the bill by prioritising an implementation plan with a clear phased timeline, alongside support and guidance for employers, and smaller businesses in particular.”

Redundancy practices and pay trends under scrutiny

The report also explored redundancy decisions made by employers in the past year. It found that 27 percent of employers had carried out a redundancy programme in the previous 12 months. Among those, half offered enhanced redundancy packages, while 41 percent provided only the statutory minimum. Nine percent were unsure what had been offered.

There is a clear difference in redundancy pay practices between larger and smaller employers. While 54 percent of small employers (with fewer than 250 employees) provided statutory redundancy pay, only 37 percent of larger private sector firms did so.

Statutory redundancy pay is not required for workers with under two years of service. However, the report notes that 66 percent of employers still chose to provide some form of financial support to these employees. Around 25 percent offered the statutory rate and a further 23 percent gave an amount between statutory and enhanced pay.

Latest news

Noisy and stuffy offices linked to lost productivity and retention concerns

UK employers are losing more than 330 million working hours each year due to office noise, poor air quality and inadequate workplace conditions.

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.
- Advertisement -

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

Must read

Jamal Elmellas: Misfiring hiring: What can be done about the disconnect between management and HR?

"The difficulties businesses are facing when it comes to recruitment do not just come down to a shortage of talent in the marketplace."

Alicia Navarro: Email apnoea is destroying your productivity

Your heart rate and blood pressure increase, and your blood vessels constrict. Your digestive system gets subdued, while your pupils dilate as you switch into life-saving mode - all because you opened your email. Alicia Navarro says this doesn't have to be the case.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you