CBI warns workers rights bill could stall growth

-

Speaking at the Confederation of British Industry’s (CBI) annual conference in London on Monday, chief executive Rain Newton-Smith said the bill lacked compromise and had not been developed with sufficient input from business. She said the proposed measures could restrict hiring flexibility, increase compliance burdens and push up operational costs.

The bill, expected to form a key part of next year’s legislative programme, would introduce stronger protections against unfair dismissal, grant more predictable working patterns and expand day-one employment rights. While ministers argue that the legislation will strengthen workplace fairness, employer groups and business leaders expressed concern about its impact on operations and growth.

Newton-Smith told delegates that eight in 10 companies believed the bill, in its current form, would make hiring more difficult. “They are brakes on growth. With real consequences for real people. We want reform that works and endures,” she said. “For that, government must change course and ask business and unions to forge consensus through compromise.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers ‘already planning changes’

New survey data released on Monday by Indeed Flex, an online marketplace for flexible and temporary work, showed that businesses were already adjusting strategy in anticipation of the bill’s possible passage.

The research, based on responses from 800 UK employers across sectors including retail, manufacturing and hospitality, found that 88 percent were aware of the proposed legislation, with 63 percent expressing concern about its impact. Over a third of respondents (36 percent) identified expanded day-one rights as the biggest operational risk, while 37 percent expected to increase their use of fixed-term and part-time contracts.

The survey also pointed to broader structural shifts. Sixty percent of employers said they were considering increased investment in automation or technology to help manage costs and administrative complexity. Two-thirds of those not currently using a managed service provider (MSP) or third-party workforce partner said they were now more likely to do so. Among businesses already using such services, 89 percent expected their reliance to increase.

Respondents expressed concern about cost pressures and the risks of early legal obligations. One said, “[D]ay-one rights could turn out to be a nightmare if new staff immediately turn out to be unsuitable,” while another added, “It’s another cost increase for struggling businesses.” But some employers also saw potential long-term benefits, with one noting it “will improve my business and growth in the long run, workers should be taken care of and made a priority”.

Novo Constare, chief executive of Indeed Flex, said his organisation was prepared to support clients as the regulatory landscape evolved. “Increased admin and compliance risk is an understandable concern – a lot is changing, but that’s where an MSP like ours can make everything easier, for businesses and workers,” he said.

Political and economic context

The CBI, which represents around 170,000 companies, said the bill should be revised through direct engagement with employers and unions. Newton-Smith said that while reform was needed, progress depended on collaboration. “Lasting reform takes partnership, not a closed door. But with this bill, though government said it wanted to listen, there has been no meaningful change. It’s disappointing and it’s damaging.”

Peter Kyle, the business secretary, told the conference that the government was committed to supporting growth through reduced costs and improved infrastructure. He announced a plan to lower electricity bills by 25 percent from April 2027 for more than 7,000 energy-intensive firms, including those in automotive and steel.

“In recent years, our most promising innovators and industries have been hamstrung by some of the highest electricity prices in the G7 and poor access to finance… In the months ahead, I will be going further to address business concerns, reverse our industrial decline and make the UK the best place to start and scale a business,” he said.

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch also addressed the event and promised to repeal the bill if elected. “We will repeal every job-destroying, anti-business, anti-growth measure in this bill,” she said.

The CBI also voiced concern about a possible new cap on salary sacrifice pension contributions expected in the upcoming budget. The Association of British Insurers and the Reward and Employee Benefits Association have warned that nearly a third of employers would reduce their contributions if the cap were introduced.

Newton-Smith said this would further damage hiring prospects. “You will never be able to tax your way to growth,” she said. “How can business hire for growth when key government choices pull the other way? When national insurance contribution rises and likely changes to salary sacrifice make it more costly to take a chance on people?”

Long-term workforce impact

Speakers at the event included Sean Doyle, chief executive of British Airways, and Sir Charlie Mayfield, former chair of the John Lewis Partnership, who recently led a government-commissioned review into how to help people stay in employment.

Employer groups said the combined effect of legislative reform, rising tax costs and administrative uncertainty risked slowing momentum in the labour market. Many companies were already rethinking job structures, workforce partnerships and compliance strategies as they awaited the bill’s final wording.

Indeed Flex said the strong interest in automation and third-party support showed that businesses were treating the issue as a broad strategic concern. The organisation said firms were aiming not just to comply with future regulation, but to stay agile in an increasingly complex employment landscape.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Employee engagement: 5 Factors that matter to employees

Denise Mortimer, Project Manager – Fit for Business, Mid...

Lyn Roseaman: How to end your speech with impact

The end of your speech is arguably even more important than the opening. Conclusions are the speaker’s opportunity to influence what their audience remembers about you and your business. It also reaffirms your authority as someone worth hearing. So, how can you end your speech with a bang, not a whimper?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you