Six out of ten mothers think their careers were ‘derailed’ after becoming pregnant

-

shutterstock_114796585

Six out of ten mothers think their careers were “derailed” and they faced open discrimination after becoming pregnant, new research by Slater & Gordon has revealed.

Millions of new mums believe they were denied work opportunities and they were forced to re-prove themselves after returning to work.

Nearly seven in ten claimed to have been taken off their career path and put on what equality campaigners have branded the ‘Mummy Track’ where they are side-lined as less experienced colleagues were often promoted ahead of them.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Three quarters of those polled reported their employer had been less interested in their career after they became a mother, while 63% said they felt their boss had a negative perception of working mothers. Nearly half said they were made to feel guilty for taking maternity leave and six in ten felt their career options were limited as soon as they announced they were pregnant.

The research into the experiences of 2,003 working mothers was commissioned by Slater & Gordon which represents hundreds of women fighting maternity discrimination across the country each year.

The law firm have released the research to coincide with the launch of Helping Working Mums to encourage women to share their experiences of maternity discrimination and highlight the issues faced by working mothers.

Senior Slater & Gordon Employment Lawyer Kiran Daurka said, “The term ‘the mummy track’ is well-known amongst those fighting maternity discrimination. We hear troubling stories from mothers every day about how they were mistreated after returning from maternity leave and have found their careers derailed.

“Some employers don’t seem to value mothers in the workplace at all and we hear from women who are side-lined from the minute they announce their pregnancy. But the desire to keep their job means that often women feel they have to turn a blind eye and watch as their male peers get promoted to senior management.

“It’s short-sighted of business to put any obstacles in the way of talented individuals who want to contribute to their company; there are millions of mothers who should be a real asset to a business, not relegated and overlooked.

“HM Government needs to do more to combat maternity discrimination, in particular, put a duty on employers to accommodate women returning to work after maternity leave in order to level the playing field.”

Slater & Gordon’s research has revealed that women often find themselves offered less senior roles (18%) and opportunities (27%), demoted (8%) and overlooked after they return from maternity leave (27%). Three quarters said they felt there was a perception that mums wouldn’t be ambitious and that their boss didn’t think they were as capable once they had children. While the average mother took just under nine months off after they had their baby, 30% were back after just three months.

When asked why they took less than their full year entitlement most women (39%) said they were worried about losing their job if they took longer and six in ten said they felt under pressure from their boss to return as quickly as possible.

Nearly half of mothers (48%) said they think they would have been taken more seriously if they had taken less maternity leave and 29% said they were made to feel like they had ‘missed too much’. Nearly eight out of ten women said the person hired to cover their maternity leave was retained by the company after they had returned and 37% admitted that this bothered them and contributed towards them finding it hard to settle back in.

A quarter supported the idea of companies having a specific programme to make sure women don’t fall off the career ladder after having children and three in ten said they would have liked to have shared their maternity leave with their partner.

On a positive note, the majority of mothers said they didn’t think their children would have the same problems in the workplace with a third of those polled blaming ‘sexist’ and ‘old fashioned’ attitudes towards mothers for their experience, and out-dated views on whether women should work or not; something one would hope will eventually die out.

Nearly a third of mothers said they thought they were a better employee after they had children despite the difficulties they faced. More than half of women thought a change in attitude towards flexible working would have helped them continue to pursue their career and 15% said a culture of ‘presenteeism’ put mothers on the back foot.

A quarter said their company needed to better implement their maternity policies and more than a third said that their firm needed to have working mothers in senior positions to inspire new mothers.

Kiran Daurka also said, “One of the key issues with maternity discrimination is that women often don’t feel they can share their experience with others as they don’t want to jeopardise their role. Women often don’t realise how widespread the issue is and how many women have similar experiences. In our experience many women that do raise a formal complaint will end up leaving and signing a confidentiality agreement as part of the settlement terms.

“Therefore, the problem is hugely prevalent but not in the public domain. To break the silence we have set up Helping Working Mums where we hope women will share their experiences of maternity discrimination. Sharing experiences will create more awareness of the issues that mums face, whilst also making women feel less alone.”

Please visit Helping Working Mums and share your experience or follow on twitter at <arel=”nofollow” href=”https://twitter.com/helpworkingmums” target=”_blank”>@helpworkingmums

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Giles Slinger: Man vs. Machine – how technology can aid HR professionals

Giles Slinger, Director of data analytics firm Concentra, discusses the impact of the man versus machine debate on the HR industry, and whether technology will ever replace the human element in business decision-making.

Luke Hildyard: Is it time for a maximum pay ratio?

Executive pay has rocketed from around 60 times the...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you