Caroline Essex: Employees shouldn’t bank on the Royal holiday

-

Before buying their Will and Kate flags and their commemorative crockery, some employees will need to check their Employment Contracts and Handbooks to find out if they will be entitled to receive the extra ‘Royal Wedding’ bank holiday.

In case you have been living on the moon recently, Prince William, the 2nd in line to the British throne, is due to wed Kate Middleton on Friday 29th April 2011, and the build-up and ceremony will be widely watched throughout the country. In order to facilitate a country-wide celebration, the Government has declared the day as a bank holiday which will be in addition to the UK’s usual 8 bank holidays. David Cameron said: “We want to mark the day as one of national celebration – a public holiday will ensure the most people possible will have a chance to celebrate on the day.”

Yet this announcement may not be well received by employers up and down the country who will be expected to pay their staff for an additional day of paid leave as well as losing profits for that day. Concerns are understandable given that the extra bank holiday follows a late Easter, making 2 four-day weekends in succession. This leaves three “working” days in between that are likely to be taken as holidays, sick days or non-productive work days. Businesses are already experiencing problems with too many people wanting time off. The Department of Business has estimated the cost upon the British economy for the extra bank holiday to be around £2.9 billion. This is not even counting the three days in between.

While most people have welcomed the prospect of an extra holiday, employees should not bank on automatically receiving this benefit. The law in England and Wales does not give employees an automatic right to paid leave on bank holidays. Businesses that are reluctant to permit their staff an extra bank holiday will only legally be obliged to do so if their company Employment Contracts and/or Handbooks particularly state an employee is entitled to, for example, ‘20 days holiday plus bank holidays’.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Where an employee’s Employment Contract/ Handbook specifically sets out the dates of all bank holidays that can be taken, for example, ‘Christmas Day, Boxing Day, May Day, August bank holiday’, that employee will not be entitled to paid leave on the Royal Wedding bank holiday. Similarly, where the Employment Contract/Handbook simply states that the employee is entitled to “28 days holiday per year” which is the legal minimum amount of annual leave for a full-time worker under the Working Time Regulations 1998, there will be no such contractual entitlement to extra paid leave. An employer with such a holiday clause may decide to close down on the 29 April 2011 but require employees to take the day out of their annual holiday allowance.

The best advice for employers is to be prepared – check your contracts of employment to see whether there is an obligation to provide the bank holiday, take advice as appropriate, communicate the position clearly as to whether the holiday is an extra or included in holiday entitlement in good time to your employees. Also ensure that there is consistency of treatment across your workforce.

Caroline‘s practice focuses on all aspects of employment law acting for both employers and employees on contentious matters such as unfair dismissal and discrimination claims, and non-contentious matter such as contract and policy drafting. Caroline is a member of the Employment Lawyers Association.

Her recent experiences include advising employees and employers on claims in the Employment Tribunal including unfair dismissal, age discrimination, race discrimination, disability discrimination and whistle blowing.

Caroline is also a member of the Employment Lawyers Association.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Phil Austin: Why HR teams should treat preventative care as a business priority

"Many of the stress-related issues affecting employees are both predictable and preventable."

Jenifer Nicol: Why the ref might not be the only whistleblower

Most employees treated in the way Jose Mourinho treated Dr Carneiro might be tempted to resign and claim constructive dismissal, with very good prospects of success, but could she also be protected as a whistleblower?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you