HR confidence masks tribunal risk as employers stall on Employment Rights Bill prep: report

-

Despite growing pressure to prepare for the most significant overhaul of employment rights in a generation, many organisations remain at an early stage or have yet to assess the impact of the legislation at all. The result, experts warn, could be rushed and inconsistent responses that lead to costly legal disputes once the Bill becomes law.

A study published by consultancy Empowering People Group suggests a worrying mismatch between strategic intent and operational delivery. While HR leaders recognise the importance of getting ready, overstretched teams, limited investment and awareness gaps are slowing progress.

Preparation gaps widen as duties near

The research, drawn from a survey of 210 HR leaders in UK firms with more than 500 employees, found that just a small minority have completed a full impact assessment and developed an action plan. A similar proportion reported that their organisation either had not started assessing the Bill’s implications or did not know whether any work had begun.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Even among those that have started preparing, most remain in the early stages. More than a third said they were still in initial discussions or early research phases, while just over a quarter were midway through assessment. The lack of urgency comes despite the expectation that some duties under the Bill will take effect immediately upon Royal Assent.

Simon Fowler, chief executive of Empowering People Group, said the Autumn Budget may have offered short-term relief but warned that the heavy lifting for HR was still ahead.

“Following Rachel Reeves’s Autumn Budget, HR and business leaders are still navigating one of the most demanding people landscapes in years,” he said. “Rising National Minimum Wage rates, ongoing fiscal pressures and accelerating legislative change are reshaping pay strategies and tightening cost margins.”

“HR were waiting with bated breath for this Budget, but even though it isn’t as admin-burden heavy as anticipated, they need to double down on preparation for the Employment Rights Bill, because the real workload is still to come.”

Internal blind spots raise the risks

The report also uncovered uneven awareness of the Bill’s potential implications within HR teams themselves. While senior leaders rated their own understanding highly, nearly one in five said their wider teams were not well informed, raising the risk of inconsistent decisions, poor communication and increased case escalation.

Adding to the pressure, nearly half of those surveyed said their HR teams were already overstretched or experiencing burnout. This is despite most HR leaders describing employee relations transformation as a strategic priority. Only a third said their organisation was making significant investment in this area, with half reporting only moderate funding.

Fowler said that this combination of stretched capacity and uneven awareness could leave organisations scrambling to comply.

“The research shows a confidence that may be masking a lack of preparedness in action and training. To avoid rushed, late-stage compliance efforts that introduce inconsistencies and increase the risk of early tribunal claims, organisations need to complete their impact assessments, develop clear action plans and proactively evolve their ER processes now,” he said.

“HR leaders need to dedicate the time and resources required, strengthen awareness within their teams and ensure managers are equipped to handle the new duties from day one. Without this decisive investment in digital ER infrastructure, updated processes and stronger capability, the significant change to come will outpace their ability to respond.”

AI, stress and speaking up drive case complexity

The data also pointed to a marked rise in employee relations case volumes over the past year, with more than seven in 10 HR leaders reporting an increase. This rising tide was linked to a mix of structural and cultural factors, including workload stress, greater openness among employees and the emergence of generative AI tools.

According to the study, the top driver of new cases was rising workload and workplace stress, followed by employees being more willing to speak up. But nearly half of respondents also pointed to AI, saying it had made it easier for employees to generate legally structured grievances, putting further pressure on HR systems and case managers.

While the Employment Rights Bill has not yet received Royal Assent, observers have warned that some requirements are expected to apply immediately once enacted. These include changes to redundancy protections, flexible working rights and new rules around predictable working patterns, among others.

With case law likely to evolve rapidly after implementation, the cost of being caught unprepared could be high. Empowering People Group is calling on HR leaders to prioritise early implementation, workforce training and clearer escalation routes to reduce the risk of early-stage non-compliance.

The group’s report, ERB Research: The compliance tsunami, urges employers to update policies, refresh manager training and develop a long-term employee relations strategy grounded in capability, consistency and legal compliance.

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Ann Casey: Global Mobility and Tax on Equity Incentives

Why should a company be concerned about the tax treatment of equity incentives? Ann Casey from Taylor Wessing explains why.

Miti Ampoma: HR can only support a modern workforce through a relational approach

It appears that HR isn’t listening anymore, says Miti Ampoma. There seem to be few opportunities – or at least few meaningful ones - for employees to share their concerns.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you