Female applicants excluded by gendered job adverts

-

New research has found that despite job vacancies being on the rise, women are being locked out of the labour market because of gendered job adverts.

The study from Applied, a hiring platform that debiases recruitment, has shown that women are being alienated by job descriptions that discourage them from applying, with masculine wording reducing the number of female applicants by as much as 10 per cent.

This comes as pressure from the pandemic has already seen women re-enter the workforce at less than half the rate of men, despite job vacancies topping one million as the economy recovers from COVID-19.

Many attribute this slow rate of re-entry to reasons such as school closures and home-schooling, as these factors disproportionately affect women.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In order to obtain this research, Applied analysed job adverts and ran each through a ‘gender score calculator’, and placed the language from the advert on a scale from ‘strongly feminine’ through to ‘strongly masculine.

In relation to job adverts that were categorised as ‘strongly masculine’, the number of female candidates applying to the role plummeted, dropping by up to 10 per cent.

In fact, only 44 per cent of applications for roles advertised as using ‘strongly masculine’ language came from female candidates.

The impact of feminine-coded language, such as ‘share’, ‘responsibility’, or ‘together’, was compared to the impact of masculine words, such as ‘challenging’, ‘driven’, and ‘individual’.

Shockingly, the study found that if an advert used feminine-coded or ‘neutral’ words, the proportion of female applicants had the potential to increase up to 54 per cent.

Furthermore, if a job advert used feminine or neutral language, a woman was more likely to not only apply, but was more likely to be offered the job.

Job adverts that featured masculine language were much more likely to have a man as the successful candidate.

Khyati Sundaram, CEO of Applied, commented:

Gendered language can be difficult to spot, as it’s so ingrained in the way we talk about certain employability characteristics, leadership skills and industries. But this research evidences the real-time impact gendered language is having on the workforce.

In order to level the playing fields and get applications from qualified women on the table, employers have a responsibility to neutralise the masculine language they’re using.

For employers, this new research provides a fresh incentive to assess job applications for gendered language in order to attract a diverse pool of applicants and support female talent.


*In order to obtain this reserch, Applied analysed a sample of 7563 closed or archived jobs to find out how many people from each gender category applied.

Megan McElroy is a second year English Literature student at the University of Warwick. As Editorial Intern for HRreview, her interests include employment law and public policy. In relation to her degree, her favourite areas of study include Small Press Publishing and political poetry.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Nick Owen: Diversity beyond the obvious, could we do more to widen inclusion?

Nick Owen looks at going beyond the obvious conventions of inclusion and delves deeper into the culture of a company and how employers should be employing the right candidate for the job and not someone who fits into a 'pigeon hole'.

Teresa Budworth:Consultants – Make a wise choice, not a poor one

Whenever an organisation seeks to use a consultant or...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you