Staff turn to unauthorised AI as demand outpaces workplace policies

-

A survey of office professionals found that two-thirds had used AI tools or services at work despite believing that doing so was not permitted under company policy. The findings point to a growing disconnect between employee adoption of AI and the rules employers have put in place to manage it.

The research, conducted by AI operations company PagerDuty, also found that workers are becoming increasingly frustrated by restrictions on AI use, with many viewing access to the technology as important for their future career development.

Data security concerns grow

The survey found that 88 percent of office professionals had shared work-related information with public AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Among those respondents, 43 percent said they had shared emails or other correspondence, while 40 percent had uploaded meeting notes or summaries.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

More concerningly, 34 percent reported sharing customer information and 31 percent said they had entered financial information or confidential company documents and strategies into public AI platforms.

The findings suggest many organisations face a challenge in balancing employee demand for AI tools with concerns about data security, privacy and compliance.

Tim Armandpour, chief technology officer at PagerDuty, warned that the growing use of public AI tools was creating new risks for employers.

“When over 30% of employees are putting confidential company data into public models, ‘Shadow AI’ becomes a massive enterprise liability.”

He said organisations should focus on providing employees with secure alternatives rather than attempting to block AI adoption altogether.

“The goal for any executive today should not be to slow down AI adoption, but to redirect that energy into proven platforms that offer governance and automation at scale.”

Employees want more AI opportunities

The research suggests that restrictions on AI use may also be creating retention challenges.

More than three-quarters of respondents said company policies were limiting their professional growth or career mobility, while 75 percent said they would consider moving to an employer offering better opportunities to develop AI skills.

The figure rose to 80 percent among employees working for organisations with annual revenues of more than $1 billion.

The survey also found that many employees believe they are ahead of their employers in understanding AI. Nearly three-quarters said they knew more about AI than their own technology teams, rising to 80 percent at larger organisations.

Meanwhile, 81 percent believed senior leaders operated under different AI rules from the rest of the workforce.

Personal use drives workplace adoption

The findings suggest that AI adoption is often beginning outside the workplace before being brought into professional settings.

Nearly nine in 10 respondents who use AI at work said they first encountered the technology in their personal lives. Once adopted, AI use appears to become more work-focused, with 79 percent reporting that they use AI more often for their job than at home.

The results point to a growing challenge for employers as AI becomes increasingly embedded in everyday work. While organisations continue to develop governance frameworks and policies, employees appear to be embracing the technology regardless, raising questions about how businesses can encourage innovation while maintaining appropriate safeguards.

The survey questioned 1,250 office professionals in non-technology roles across the UK, United States, Australia and Japan. All respondents worked for organisations with annual revenues of at least $500 million.

Managing Editor at Black | Website

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Fit for Work: Weekend warrior? You can still reap the health benefits

Weekend exercise can still improve long-term health, even for people who struggle to fit physical activity into the working week.

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.
- Advertisement -

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Must read

Robert Leeming: Atmosphere and analytics are the future of innovation in HR

Innovation in HR is crucial as an innovative HR department will help to produce an innovative company. Recent research, for example, has found that employers are missing out on a host of innovative ideas by not listening to their staff.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you