Recruitment agencies display ‘casual racial discrimination’, alleges charity

-

Jobseekers from ethnic minority backgrounds are not treated by recruitment agencies in an equal way to white candidates, according to Race for Opportunity (RfO).

Research released by the charity today claims that over the past 12 months only 29 per cent of candidates from a black, Asian or ethnic minority backgrounds going through a recruitment agency were offered a job compared to 44 per cent of white applicants.

Furthermore the report, entitled Race and Recruitment: exposing the barriers, stated that just 57 per cent of BAME jobseekers were invited for at least one interview, compared to nearly three-quarters (73 per cent) of white candidates.

The study, which included the experiences of 2,500 job seekers over the course of 12 months, concluded that “casual racial discrimination” from recruitment agencies was “prevalent in the UK”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Sandra Kerr, director at RfO, said: “Tough economic times and rising unemployment levels mean that the current job market is extremely competitive, with a high number of applications for every role.

“If BAME candidates are not being treated fairly by the recruiters at all stages of the job application process, then they are at a distinct disadvantage from the outset.”

Citing reasons of poor initial contact and responsiveness, and being put forward for roles that do not match their skills set, BAME candidates were found less likely to use a recruitment agency than white jobseekers.

Compared to 88 per cent of white candidates, the study showed that 91 per cent of BAME applicants applied straight to an employer rather than using an intermediary.

Tom Hadley, director of policy and professional services at the REC, has responded to the research by urging industry figures to consider the factors that lie beneath the decision to make a job offer such as qualifications and work experience.

He added: “At the same time, there is always more that can be done to recognise and address unconscious bias and to look at established procedures that may indirectly create barriers for job-seekers.”

“There is absolutely no reason for recruiters to do anything other than put together to best possible short-list.”

Latest news

Employers prioritise cost control over growth as confidence remains weak, CIPD says

Rising labour, energy and operating expenses are keeping employers cautious on hiring, pay and investment despite a modest rise in recruitment intentions.

Ciara Harrington: Why an AI strategy without skills visibility is just guesswork

Organisations are racing to adopt AI, but does the workforce actually have the skills to use it in meaningful, productive ways?

Maureen Kyne on hidden problems in workplace reporting

“Upward bullying is frequently buried within aggregated HR reporting, labelled as ‘conflict’ or ‘personality clashes’, masking its true impact and preventing meaningful oversight.”

Scott Mills preparing unfair dismissal claim against BBC after Radio 2 sacking: report

The former Radio 2 presenter is reportedly preparing an unfair dismissal claim against the BBC following his removal earlier this year.
- Advertisement -

Alison Lucas & Lizzie Bentley Bowers: Why your offboarding process is as vital as onboarding

We know that beginnings shape performance and culture, so we take time to get them right. Endings are often rushed, avoided or delegated to process.

Reward gaps leave part-time and public sector staff ‘at disadvantage’

Unequal access to staff perks leaves part-time and public sector workers less recognised despite strong links between incentives and engagement.

Must read

Nick Stephens: Addressing the boardroom gender gap

The issue of gender balance within UK boards has...

Jo Matkin: Man vs machine: the impact of technology on HR and the workplace

With technology developing at a constant rate, it’s inevitable that the way people work and are managed will change in the years to come. Boston Consulting Group recently estimated that, by 2025, up to a quarter of jobs will be replaced by either smart software or robots. As well as impacting the wider workforce, this is bound to have a significant effect on HR and resourcing functions.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you