HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Absence one of most common reasons for failing probation period

-

How does summer drastically increase stress levels within the workplace?

Almost one in five workers (18%) have had their probation period extended or failed according to new research from Spring Personnel.

The research which surveyed both employees and managers nationwide found poor performance is the most common reason employers cite for failing new employees (62%).  Absence is also a common reason for failing a probation, accounting for half (50%) of all failures, and bad time-keeping accounted for four in ten failures (38%).

Surprisingly, personality clashes are common too: over one in ten managers (12%) cite falling out as cause to give someone the heave-ho.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The research also found only one in five businesses (21%) never extend a candidate’s probation period suggesting there is flexibility in probations.

The research also found:

  • For many of us probations are a time of anxiety. Almost half of us feel insecure (49%) during a probation and four in ten (38%) of us feel worried;
  • One in five of us (22%) put more effort into a job during a probation than we would once the job is secured;
  • According to 71% of employers, there are employees who fail the probation period at their companies. At 60% of companies, the failure rate is up to 10% of new employees.

How much are these figures down to poor hiring practices?

Our research revealed that many individuals fail probation as a result of their own behaviour during this period – rather than poor hiring practices – with half (50%) of individuals failing due to absences in work and over a third (38%) because of poor time-keeping. Our advice to candidates is to make sure these basic, but very important, qualities and attributes are upheld during a probation period to ensure an employee puts their best foot forward.

The research revealed that over a third (36%) of employers particularly dread having to tell an employee they have failed probation, and will therefore ensure they do their best to hire the best candidate for the job.

Is probation still seen as a relevant safety net for both companies and new starters?

According to our research, 96% of employers stated that they consider the probation period to be an integral part of new employee induction. We see it as a period of mutual benefit rather than a ‘safety net’, allowing the employer to up skill an employee and ensure they settle into the role, while at the same time permitting the employee to consider his or her suitability for the role.

The hiring process is costly and can be time consuming to find the right candidate so we always advise that companies take a variety of measures, including training, appraisals, shadowing and progress reports to ensure the probationary period is a successful one.

Article by Alex Fleming, managing director of Spring Personnel

Latest news

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Employment tribunal roundup: Secondment status, dismissal reasoning and whistleblowing protections examined

EAT rulings clarify secondment status, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and whistleblowing protection, with practical lessons on process and legal thresholds.

Mental health cited in a third of sickness absence cases ahead of sick pay changes

Stress, anxiety and depression are driving a growing share of workplace absence as new sick pay rules expand eligibility from April.
- Advertisement -

Peter Dando: Why ‘salary sacrifice’ needs renaming

Salary sacrifice schemes are designed to help employees make smarter financial choices - but they remain widely misunderstood.

HR hiring rises as firms respond to compliance pressure and employment law changes

HR and accounting roles see strong pay and hiring growth as businesses prepare for new employment law requirements and greater regulatory complexity.

Must read

Bar Huberman: Work-life balance – a must-have for business success

The CEO of BrewDog made headlines by criticising the concept of work-life balance, saying it was invented by people who hate their jobs...

Deborah Lewis: Engagement – the fundamental conflict

Ever since William and Kate made their announcement, I’ve...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you