Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

-

Nearly six in ten leaders believe employees collaborate with AI every day, yet fewer than half of workers say they actually do so, according to new research examining AI adoption in the workplace commissioned by AI upskilling platform Multiverse.

The gap suggests many executives may have limited visibility into how artificial intelligence tools are really being used across frontline roles.

Leadership perception ‘out of step with reality’

The research shows that 59 percent of leaders believe employees work with AI daily, while only 42 percent of employees say they collaborate with the technology each day.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Leaders also appear to overestimate how extensively AI is being used for specific workplace tasks.

While 60 percent of leaders believe employees regularly use AI to automate repetitive tasks, only 36 percent of workers say they do so. A similar gap appears in data analysis for decision making, where 58 percent of leaders think employees rely on AI compared with 33 percent of workers who report doing so.

The data also suggests that AI use differs significantly depending on seniority.

More than half of mid-level employees, 52 percent, say they use AI in their work every day. By contrast, only 21 percent of junior employees report doing the same.

No ‘one-size-fits-all approach’

A similar pattern appears within management roles. Almost half of middle managers, 48 percent, say they collaborate with AI daily, compared with just 20 percent of individual contributors.

Gary Eimerman, chief learning officer at Multiverse, said the findings showed that organisations need more targeted approaches to training. “AI is not a monolithic tool, and its application varies wildly between a junior developer, a middle manager and a CEO,” he said. “The 30% gap in adoption we see between seniority levels is a clear signal that the one-size-fits-all approach to AI is failing.”

He said businesses must develop more tailored training programmes for different roles. “To bridge this divide, businesses must move beyond generic training and implement custom AI upskilling paths tailored to the unique daily workflows of every individual,” he said.

Limited training leaving leaders unprepared

The research suggests that many leaders themselves may not yet be fully equipped to guide AI adoption.

More than half of leaders, 55 percent, report receiving fewer than five hours of formal training on artificial intelligence from their organisations.

Instead, many say they are learning informally. Around 58 percent of leaders say they rely on experimenting with tools such as ChatGPT to teach themselves the basics of AI.

Both leaders and employees also identify cultural barriers to wider adoption. More than half of leaders, 53 percent, say resistance to change is a major obstacle, while 57 percent of employees point to negative attitudes towards AI as a barrier.

Despite these challenges, the research indicates strong support for greater investment in training. Eighty five percent of leaders and 78 percent of employees say more frequent AI training will be necessary to keep pace with rapid technological change.

The research was conducted by consulting firm Coleman Parkes among 2,000 respondents in the UK and the United States, including 810 technology leaders and 1,190 employees.

Managing Editor at Black | Website

William Furney is a Managing Editor at Black and White Trading Ltd based in Kingston upon Hull, UK. He is a prolific author and contributor at Workplace Wellbeing Professional, with over 127 published posts covering HR, employee engagement, and workplace wellbeing topics. His writing focuses on contemporary employment issues including pension schemes, employee health, financial struggles affecting workers, and broader workplace trends.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Mapping organisational virtue.

In this article, Geoff Moore, Professor of Business Ethics...

Richard Stockley: The growing skills gap is making the workplace more dangerous

Young people are increasingly pursuing health and safety qualifications, but the skills gap could still undermine this progress, according to Richard Stockley.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you