Mark Kaye: What does the implementation of Plan B mean for employers? 

-

With 336,893 new COVID-19 cases reported in the seven days ending on 8 December 2021 (the highest since the week to 16 January 2021) and the concern around the transmissibility of the Omicron variant, it is little surprise that the government has now announced the implementation of “Plan B”, writes Mark Kaye.

What is “Plan B”? 

As part of its COVID-19 Response: Autumn and Winter Plan, the government clarified that if the data suggests the NHS is likely to come under unsustainable pressure, it prepared a “Plan B” for England.   

The government’s “Plan B” prioritises measures which can help control transmission of the virus while seeking to minimise economic and social impacts. This includes: 

  • Communicating clearly and urgently to the public that the level of risk has increased, and with it the need to behave more cautiously. 
  • Introducing mandatory vaccine-only COVID-status certification in certain settings. 
  • Legally mandating face coverings in certain settings (although this is now already a legal requirement on public transport and in retail settings).  
  • Possibly asking people once again to work from home if they can, for a limited period.  Although the government recognises this causes more disruption and has greater immediate costs to the economy and some businesses than the other Plan B interventions. 

What new restrictions are coming into force?  

  • With effect from 10 December 2021 (Monday), masks must be worn at most public indoor venues (including cinemas and theatres), unless people are exercising, eating, drinking or singing.  
  • With effect from 13 December 2021, people should work from home if they are able to do so.  
  • With effect from 15 December 2021, COVID status certification is required for nightclubs or other large crowded spaces, including all unseated indoor venues with a capacity of 500 or more; all unseated outdoor venues of 4,000 or more; or any venue, seated or not, which contain 10,000 or more.  It has been indicated that negative lateral flow tests may also suffice.  

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Implications for employers 

In recent months, many employers have been working hard to bring their people back into the office.  There has also been a huge focus on rolling out hybrid working arrangements and accompanying policies. These measures will now need to be reconsidered. 

Employers who need their staff to come into the office without good reason may well face pushback from their workforce and risk claims being brought in the employment tribunal. 

Blanket policies should be avoided – instead the circumstances that apply to each employee should be properly considered. 

 

Hospitality sector

Employers operating in the cinema and theatre sector are likely to be impacted by the mask mandate and may need to consider whether reduced audiences will mean that staff rotas need to be altered and, in a worst case scenario, whether a reduction in headcount is necessary.  

The hospitality and leisure sector will need to be mindful that the introduction of COVID-status certification may well apply to their businesses and, again, a likely reduction in customers may mean that changes may need to be taken in relation to the workforce.   

 

Conclusion

If the Plan B restrictions lead to redundancies, employers will need to be mindful of their obligations to carry out a proper process (particularly where employees have unfair dismissal rights).  In addition, where mass redundancies are proposed (i.e. a proposal to dismissal 20 or more employees at one establishment within a 90 day period), employers will be saddled with additional collective consultation obligations. 

 

 ——-

Mark Kaye is an employment lawyer at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP 

employment lawyer at Bryan | Website

Mark Kaye is an employment lawyer at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP. He has been a frequent commentator on employment-related COVID-19 issues throughout 2020 and has written articles for numerous HR publications and been interviewed by LBC News a number of times to comment on COVID-19 developments.

Latest news

Martin Johnson: Why the Employment Rights Act marks the end of informal management

It’s crucial that organisations quickly realise the Employment Rights Act isn’t solely a legal change. In effect, it marks the end of informal management.

Unpaid wage claims ‘hit eight-year high’ as business failures rise

Rising insolvencies are leaving growing numbers of workers unpaid as HR teams face mounting legal risks around rushed redundancies and delayed wages.

Employers urged to rethink race for chief AI officers

Companies are being warned against rushing to appoint chief AI officers before establishing the systems and leadership structures needed to support them.

Building workforce skills for AI performance

AI is changing the way work gets done—but most organisations still lack a clear plan for building AI-ready teams.
- Advertisement -

UK risks ‘lost generation’ as youth unemployment crisis deepens

A major review warns that Britain could face a “lost generation” as youth unemployment and economic inactivity continue rising.

‘Delighted to be wrong about jobs apocalypse’, says OpenAI boss Altman

The OpenAI chief executive said human interaction remained far harder to replace than many technology leaders first predicted.

Must read

5 tips for employers to support their staff’s mental health

Jaan Madan, Workplace Lead at Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) England, shares five ways workplaces can ensure they are supporting their employees’ mental health and   creating a mentally healthy workplace.

Doug Chapman: Creating a collaborative learning culture

Workplace learning has a significant impact on the bottom line and for businesses looking to save on budget while still promoting strong people development, there are some relatively low-cost options beyond simply paying to send staff on learning programmes.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you