Women 40% more likely to have their job replaced by AI than men

-

A new report by social enterprise Code First Girls and Tech Talent Charter reveals that the current approach to technology skills development is ‘not fit for purpose,’ leaving women at an increased risk of ‘being left behind’ in the age of AI.

The report highlights that women are 40 percent more likely to have their work replaced by automation than men.

It is also revealed that 80 percent of women in tech say they are not receiving the career development opportunities they desire.

Titled ‘Building Tomorrow’s Workforce: Inclusive Skills Development in the Age of AI,’ the report calls on tech leaders to urgently implement upskilling and reskilling programs.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

These initiatives are crucial to ensuring women are valued and empowered to succeed in an increasingly automated world.

Guidelines for managing the development of AI

The report outlines ten key recommendations for tech leaders, including prioritising skills mapping, reshaping recruitment processes, and establishing ethical guidelines and policies for AI. The urgency of these measures is underscored by estimates that 1 billion jobs will be transformed by technology and 43 percent of work tasks will become automated by 2027. With women being 40 percent more likely to have their work replaced by AI automation, companies that fail to introduce upskilling initiatives risk further entrenching gender disparities in the tech sector.

A survey conducted by Code First Girls found that 41 percent of women are worried that AI could replace their current roles, and 30 percent report that their companies do not provide opportunities for skill development to adapt to these changes. Investing in training and development programs is essential for companies to bridge this gap.

AI isn’t immune to human bias

Anna Brailsford, CEO and Co-Founder of Code First Girls, stated, “AI development, while promising, isn’t immune to human bias. With 90 percent of software engineers being men, there’s a risk that AI adoption may perpetuate societal biases. Inclusive reskilling is capable of releasing the fullest spectrum of our human intelligence and creativity, unhindered by the biases of the status quo. This report is a pathway for tech employers to facilitate these programs, with inclusivity at their core.”

Karen Blake, Co-CEO of Tech Talent Charter, added, “In the ever-changing landscape of technology, it is crucial to create inclusive skills programs for the future. This goes beyond just a strategic plan; it reflects our commitment to fairness and progress. By embracing diversity, we can unlock the full potential of emerging technologies and create a future where everyone, regardless of their background, can thrive and make meaningful contributions. We need to be intentional in our approach to upskilling and reskilling, and create an environment that supports lifelong learning, values different skill sets, and encourages individual differences. When we develop inclusive skills programs, we are not just closing gaps; we are paving the way for progress and prosperity.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Employers prioritise cost control over growth as confidence remains weak, CIPD says

Rising labour, energy and operating expenses are keeping employers cautious on hiring, pay and investment despite a modest rise in recruitment intentions.

Ciara Harrington: Why an AI strategy without skills visibility is just guesswork

Organisations are racing to adopt AI - but does the workforce actually have the skills to use it in meaningful, productive ways?

Maureen Kyne on hidden problems in workplace reporting

“Upward bullying is frequently buried within aggregated HR reporting, labelled as ‘conflict’ or ‘personality clashes’, masking its true impact and preventing meaningful oversight.”

Scott Mills preparing unfair dismissal claim against BBC after Radio 2 sacking: report

The former Radio 2 presenter is reportedly preparing an unfair dismissal claim against the BBC following his removal earlier this year.
- Advertisement -

Alison Lucas & Lizzie Bentley Bowers: Why your offboarding process is as vital as onboarding

We know that beginnings shape performance and culture, so we take time to get them right. Endings are often rushed, avoided or delegated to process.

Reward gaps leave part-time and public sector staff ‘at disadvantage’

Unequal access to staff perks leaves part-time and public sector workers less recognised despite strong links between incentives and engagement.

Must read

Dr Alex Linley: Are people analytics and psychometric testing essential to recruitment?

"Managers are inevitably subject to some prevalent human biases."

Giles Newman: It’s time to change perceptions of whistleblowing

"Whistleblowers can act as an early warning system that can shed light on sensitive issues organisations may be unaware of."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you