One third of employer actively discriminate, reveals CIPD

-

New research jointly commissioned by Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and KPMG reveals a startling picture of employer bias towards disadvantaged groups. Less than one in four employers have hired from disadvantaged groups, such as ex offenders, young people with no qualifications and the long term unemployed during the last three years.

The survey also reveals that when employers were asked to rate these groups in terms of performance with other employees, employers rated their performance generally equal to that of other employees. The report concludes that there is an unfair negative attitude towards these groups and more needs to be done by government to help overcome barriers.

Around one third (32%) of employers actively exclude certain disadvantaged groups from the recruitment process. Although this is an improvement from 2005 when a similar CIPD survey found that 62% of employers excluded one or more disadvantaged groups from the recruitment process, however it still represents a wide section of the workforce being actively excluded.

Nearly one fifth (19%) of employers will not even consider applications from ex-offenders, 16% of employers exclude young people aged 18 and under with few or no qualifications and 9% of organisations exclude applications from people aged over 65 or older.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Commenting on the findings Gerwyn Davies, CIPD Public Policy Adviser, said:

“The extent of exclusion is not in every case justified on the basis of the potential of almost every target group. For example, employers with experience of employing ex-offenders consider them at least as productive as other workers and a majority of employers consider them to be more loyal than the rest of the workforce. This would suggest that people with criminal records and individuals from other target groups are in many cases being unfairly excluded from the recruitment process. More must be done therefore by policy makers, working with employers, to challenge these often inaccurate and negative stereotypes.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Chris Roebuck: How to turn your HR function into a ‘profit centre’

Organisations need to create a culture that makes people give their best, but many fail to do this as they assume such a culture already exists. How can organisations change this?

Phil Williams: Supercharging employee engagement in 2026

HR leaders are moving through 2026 facing familiar pressures: economic caution, talent shortages, and the demand to do more with less.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you