32% of companies offer no system whereby employees can record discrimination

-

Almost a third (32%) of companies have said they have no system that offers individual employees the possibility to report discrimination.

While an encouraging 68 percent of UK companies are committed to removing unconscious bias from the recruitment process, many are still falling short in implementing a systematic reporting system that tracks against solid ED&I objectives.

As last Saturday (May 21st) marks World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development, new research from HR & payroll leader SD Worx highlights a lack of focus on progressing diversity in the workplace.

“It’s no longer enough for businesses to say they prioritise diversity and inclusion. Instead, they must prove their commitment to achieving a more diverse workforce, both internally within their business and externally to attract talent,” says UK HR Country Lead at SD Work, Colette Philp.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

Commitment to equality

According to the SD Worx research, the UK ranks 3rd in its commitment to removing unconscious bias in the workplace (68%), behind Ireland which ranks in 1st place (74%) and Belgium in 2nd (69%).

When it comes to equal access to training, the UK ranks slightly lower than other countries with an average of 64 percent of companies saying they invest in equal access to training and development opportunities.

Ireland, Belgium, and Poland took the top spots (72%, 71% and 69% respectively).

While most UK companies also include this in their mission statement and corporate values (64%), it is slightly less likely to feature in recruitment activities, with only 3 in 5 (60%) UK companies surveyed saying they promote ED&I in job advertisements (58%), social media (52%) and their website (59%).

Clearly, there is more work to be done on transparency about ED&I goals and actions in pursuit of attracting a diverse workforce.

 

A lack of action

Despite managers’ efforts there is still a lack of clearly defined action in systematic follow-ups, such as a transparent reporting system.

This applies, for example, to the evaluation of the commitment of managers to achieve the proposed diversity goals.

Only 26 percent of UK companies surveyed scored that they ‘very much’ provide an evaluation of the commitment of managers to achieve ED&I related objectives.

Also, almost a third (32%) said they have no system that offers individual employees the possibility to report discrimination.

 

What should employers and managers be doing?

“There is more awareness than ever before regarding diversity in the workplace and it’s a deciding factor for many when it comes to searching for a role or staying with a business. A diverse workforce brings new experiences and perspectives and an inclusive environment allows individuals to thrive. If businesses aren’t already putting ED&I as a top priority, it’s essential they act now to do so,” says Ms Philip.

“It’s important that companies start investing in an active reporting system about their actions concerning diversity, equality and inclusion. On the one hand, that data offers a strong basis for optimising the diversity policy with concrete and consciously controlled actions. On the other hand, such a system also provides clear evidence whether companies are effectively putting their money where their mouth is and not making false promises to (future) employees,” suggests Portfolio Manager SD Worx Insights, Jurgen Dejonghe.

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

The dreaded (or not so dreaded) Brexit: How leaving the EU will change employment law

For the first time in a generation there is a real possibility of the UK leaving the EU. With this in mind we consider the possible effect on employers in some key areas and a few "what if" scenarios.

Alex Wilke: How a Chief Feedback Officer can improve employee feedback

Collecting and acting on feedback from employees and customers is becoming essential to successful business decision making, prompting discussions about the emergence of a new board level representative – the Chief Feedback Officer – to take control of the area.  What’s behind this idea and what exactly would someone with that job title do anyway?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you