HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Working mother wins £40,000 after employer refuses to accommodate part-time hours

-

A senior flight attendant has been awarded £40,000 after an employment tribunal found she was discriminated against by her employer, British Airways CityFlyer.

An employment tribunal has found that British Airways CityFlyer carried out indirect sex discrimination after the airline failed to give a new mother part-time hours following the birth of her daughter.

Chloe Daly, an In-Flight Business Manager, fell pregnant in late 2016. Following a certain point in her pregnancy, Mrs. Daly was permitted to work from home part of the time and from the office, working normal hours.

Following the birth of her daughter in July 2017, Mrs. Daly was unable to find adequate childcare which would be flexible around the variable days she would have to work under her current shift pattern.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In light of this, Mrs. Daly put in a flexible working request.

This included an overall reduction of hours by 25 per cent and set days off during the week.

However, the claimant also proposed more flexible working on her side in order to accommodate the new schedule including working more weekends and summer holidays, if needed, as her husband was at home to take care of the baby on these days.

Mrs. Daly ultimately proposed a six month trial period “to see if it works for both the company and [herself]”.

However, this request was ultimately rejected in August 2017 with the respondent stating there was an inability to reorganise work amongst existing staff and that this move would have a detrimental impact on quality and performance, notably team morale.

The employment tribunal noted that the respondent “scarcely engaged with the detail of [Mrs. Daly’s proposals]”, failed to make enquiries of other In-Flight Business Managers (despite stating the detrimental impact on team morale in the rejection letter) and “gave no proper consideration to the question of how any adverse impact could be minimised”.

This decision did not surprise Mrs. Daly as, in her capacity as a manager, she herself had to apply the policy and noted their employer “was overall very resistant to granting flexibility”.

As such, the majority of cabin crew who took maternity leave either left immediately after the end of their leave, or shortly after returning on a full-time basis.

On their side, BA CityFlyer failed to show any evidence that showed the company had granted flexible working by reason of childcare responsibilities.

Additionally, it could not say whether there had been any occasions when crew were allowed to return to work part-time after coming back from maternity leave.

Although trying to appeal against this decision, Mrs. Daly ultimately resigned in May 2018, primarily due to the flexible working request being denied.

Ultimately, Employment Judge Massarella concluded that the claim of indirect sex discrimination did succeed.

The Tribunal found that the Respondent was open to flexible working requests when they arose out of medical circumstances, but resistant when they arose by reason of childcare responsibilities.

This amounted to indirect sex discrimination as the tribunal noted “part-time working, and a more predictable working pattern, are often of particular benefit to women” and “primary childcare responsibility still falls disproportionately on women”.

As such, the Tribunal awarded Mrs. Daly £38,741,55 in compensation for unlawful discrimination.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Stuart Keeble: Using technology to transform HR: lose the paper and stay compliant

Stuart Keeble looks at why digital, cloud-based sharing technologies are important for the future running of HR and how they can help to improve productivity.

Rebecca Hughes: Weaponising AI – how can employers respond?

An emerging trend that we are observing is that employees are using AI to raise formal workplace grievances and in litigating their claims.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you