Most UK employees would rather suffer in silence

-

21% of employees think admitting to health concerns could affect their work prospects and 11% claim they simply don’t trust their boss. Although nearly a quarter of employees (23%) state this is just a matter of safeguarding their privacy, the research portrays a worrying distance between employer and employee.

Only 4% of employees say they would approach their boss with a health concern. A further 5% claim they might confide in a colleague. Just 1% said they would trust their problems to the HR department. By comparison 60% say they would unburden themselves to their partner and 33% would speak to the family doctor according to the Aviva Health of the Workplace 4 Study.

On the other hand employers, are convinced that they are doing all they can 39% claim to make a point of identifying any employee issues; and 42% say they operate an open door policy. But, while employers do seem to be taking positive steps to tackle health issues through the introduction of benefits such as private health insurance, group income protection and confidential helplines, they are doing little to communicate that the support services are available.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Doug Wright, principal clinical consultant at Aviva UK Health, said: “It’s good to see that employers recognise the importance of having an open door policy when it comes to their employees’ health and wellbeing, but we want to make them aware of the worrying disconnect between their perception and the reality to help them take steps to tackle the issues.

“The breakdown in communication between employers and their staff means that health risks such as stress in the workplace are not being effectively managed. Lack of employee engagement will also hinder an employer’s ability to intervene early and offer their employees the right support at the right time.



Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

‘We put our people at the forefront of every decision we make’ says Natasha Waterfield

We spoke with Natasha Waterfield, Head of Human Resources about her work at the New World Trading Company (NWTC) and winning the Sunday Times award for 'the best 100 companies to work for'.

Dr Emma Waltham: How are companies acting on the gender pay gap?

Dr Emma Waltham explores the ways in which companies are acting on the gender pay gap, and outlines what more is needed to be urgently done.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you