Wellbeing initiatives blocked by lack of senior management support

-

Research explores the key barriers which prevent HR teams from implementing wellbeing initiatives which are mainly linked to a lack of support from senior management staff. 

New research from Westfield Health, a wellbeing and health services provider, shows the key factors which are preventing HR from tackling mental health in the work place.

According to the data, the biggest barrier to implementing wellbeing initiatives is a lack of buy-in from senior leaders which almost a third (31 per cent) of HR leaders reported struggling with.

Following this, a quarter (25 per cent) of the leaders stated they had limited budgets which prohibited them from introducing the initiatives they had planned.  Despite research suggesting a decline in employees’ mental health, over a fifth (22 per cent) of HR leaders felt that there was limited interest towards staff towards these wellbeing strategies.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Over one in 10 HR leaders stated that they had a lack of time (12 per cent) which meant they could not implement wellbeing strategies.

However, this data paints a worrying picture when almost half of all organisations (45 per cent) identify tackling mental health issues in the workplace as their biggest challenge within wellbeing. Additionally, over a fifth of HR leaders stated that their biggest challenge was dealing with stress in the workplace (22 per cent). Just under a fifth (18 per cent) said poor employee engagement was the most prevalent concern.

When analysing the best ways to measure the impact of wellbeing programmes, HR leaders did so in different ways. Around two-thirds (64 per cent) found increased engagement to be a key indicator of the success of a wellbeing programme. Just under a fifth (17 per cent) felt reduced absence levels was the most important signal whilst over one in 10 (11 per cent) cited reduced staff turnover as an important way to see whether the wellbeing initiatives being implemented are working. Only 8 per cent used increased productivity to gauge the success of a wellbeing programme.

Vicky Walker, Head of People at Westfield Health said:

This pandemic has placed business in the most extreme of climates, testing the wellbeing and flexibility of companies with little advance warning. Some have embraced this challenge, altered their wellbeing approach and will benefit as a result. But others are yet to see wellbeing as an important strategic tool to aid recovery. If HR leaders can get support from the top down, then we can work together to create happier, healthier, thriving companies.

With the benefits of happier workers, better retention rates and higher productivity, there is a powerful argument for investing in wellbeing as a core, strategic element to strengthen a company. Getting a clear baseline of employee wellbeing needs through surveys then tracking the implementation and impact of programmes will help HR teams make the case for starting, sustaining or even increasing investment in wellbeing programmes.

Putting wellbeing first isn’t just about investment – it’s about culture. With genuine, visible and consistent support from senior leaders, companies will be able to make health and wellbeing an integral part of how they do business. That in turn leads to reduced turnover, increased productivity and happier, more engaged teams – benefits no business can currently afford to ignore.

*To obtain these results, Westfield Health surveyed over 400 HR leaders in the UK.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Jeanette Makings: The impact of pensions

How aware are employees - or even employers -...

Ethnicity pay reporting: why it’s not that simple

Is ethnicity pay gap reporting really that simple? Law firm Lewis Silkin tell us what to expect after the recent Government consultation.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you