Names of firms who have received furlough support should be published, MPs say

-

This is part of a move towards greater transparency which, the Committee argues, will help prevent, detect and correct fraud and error arising from the furlough scheme.

A new report from the Committee of Public Accounts warns that more needs to be done in order to rectify fraud and error which has occurred after the introduction of coronavirus support schemes.

Even prior to the pandemic, figures suggest fraud cost the taxpayer between £29.3 billion to £51.8 billion in 2018–19.

The Cabinet estimates that fraud constitutes almost half (40 per cent) of all crime committed across the UK.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

A previous report from the Committee has suggested that there could be up to £3.5 billion of furlough payments being fraudulent or made in error, an estimated 10 per cent of all furlough claims.

In light of this, recommendations by the Committee included publishing the names of businesses who have received financial support through the COVID-19 support schemes.

This, they argue, would provide transparency and give the opportunity for whistle blowers and others to report suspicious claims, allowing HMRC to recover lost money.

This would be carried out through increased data sharing between departments which would allow for data matching. However, the body notes that this will take a substantial amount of time to establish due to data protection requirements.

Furthermore, the Committee also recommended that the Treasury work with all Departments to identify and publish all the fraud and error risks to public money across government.

As part of this, the Treasury has been asked to introduce mandatory fraud impact assessments that require formal sign off. A summary of all these assessments is also expected to be made public.

This report comes just as changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme are expected to take place.

From today (1st July), employers will be expected to contribute 10 per cent towards furloughed workers’ salaries whilst the Government supplies the remaining 70 per cent.

A government spokesperson reacted to the findings of the report:

Our priority was to act at speed to protect workers and businesses, including through loans, grants, furlough and the Self-Employment Income Support scheme which have provided a lifeline to millions across the UK – helping them to survive the pandemic and protecting jobs.

These schemes were designed to minimise fraud from the outset and we have rejected or blocked thousands of fraudulent claims. We won’t tolerate those who seek to defraud taxpayers and will take action against perpetrators, including through criminal prosecution.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Lyn Roseaman: How to end your speech with impact

The end of your speech is arguably even more important than the opening. Conclusions are the speaker’s opportunity to influence what their audience remembers about you and your business. It also reaffirms your authority as someone worth hearing. So, how can you end your speech with a bang, not a whimper?

MAC report isn’t a crowd pleaser for businesses

Published with the aim of informing migration policy after Brexit, the recommendations set out in the Government’s MAC (Migration Advisory Committee) report, which have been given an initial nod of approval by the cabinet, are essentially giving to the UK economy with one hand and taking away with the other.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you