Two-thirds of companies are mis-identifying their true High Potential candidates

-

businessman attractive

CEB, the leading US member-based advisory company, today revealed that more than two-thirds of companies are misidentifying their high-potential employees thereby jeopardizing long-term corporate performance. This failure drives true High Potential (HiPo)—those who demonstrate the attributes to be successful future leaders—to pursue positions with potentially competitive organizations willing to invest in their development. In order to keep top talent in house and maximize bottom-line results, companies must re-evaluate and reinvigorate their HiPo programs.

Major corporations spend an average of £2 million every year on leadership and development programs for HiPo employees, but 55% of these employees will turn over in a five-year period, resulting in wasted money and an insufficient leadership bench. The inability to establish a strong, diverse leadership pipeline impairs bottom-line performance since organizations with weak leadership generate roughly half the revenue and profit growth as those with strong leadership.

“There is mounting pressure on companies to realize the value of any talent investment made, especially HiPo programs which deliver future leaders for the business. Too often resources,training and career opportunities are directed at employees who lack the aspiration, engagement or ability to be effective at the next level. This misidentification is preventing those with the strongest potential from reaching senior roles and could restrict an organization’s future productivity, innovation and performance,” said Eugene Burke, chief science and analytics officer, CEB.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Companies can expect to improve the success of their programs more than 10-fold by correctly identifying HiPos and engaging them with the right training and development. Not only are they well positioned to groom employees for senior leadership positions, but will also strengthen talent pipelines and reduce flight risk for the business longer term.

Insights from a decade of research sampling 6.6 million people and more than 100 Fortune 500 HR leaders suggest that companies can improve the caliber of leaders and create incentives for HiPos to stay by applying a four-pronged approach:

  1. Redefine “potential”. Adopt a clearer definition that accounts for the key attributes employees need to have in order to rise to more senior roles: the desire to assume senior positions (aspiration), manage and lead others effectively (ability), as well as having the commitment to realise their career goals with their current employer (engagement).
  2. Measure potential objectively. Rather than relying solely on subjective manager nominations or evaluation, organisations should adopt a systematic process for identifying HiPo talent through objective talent assessment and evaluation.
  3. Ask for commitment in return for career opportunities. Proactively evaluate engagement and act to mitigate flight risk among HiPo employees by evaluating their engagement today and their longer-term commitment to the organisation in the future.
  4. Create differentiated development experiences. Typical HiPo programs provide opportunities for incremental skill building but fail to prepare HiPo employees for realistic future roles. The best organisations help HiPos learn new skills, but also apply existing skills in different roles by exposing them to high-impact development experiences.

To learn more about how to increase the return on HiPo programs download “Improving the Odds of Success for High-Potential Programs.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Paul Holcroft: Why the scrapping of the EU Settlement fees is good news for employers

It's a good thing both from an employment law and economic point of view.

Tom Quayle: The University Challenge: What is a degree worth in 2015?

This year marks the graduation of the first students who had to pay £9,000 a year in tuition fees – and, worryingly, ComRes recently revealed that half of them feel their degrees weren’t worth the money.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you