HRreview Header

40% would take a pay cut for better benefits

-

In a recent survey conducted by MetLife UK, it was revealed that 40 percent of UK employees would willingly accept a lower salary in exchange for better employee benefits, such as income protection, death in service benefits, and hybrid working options.

The findings come amidst a growing demand for improved workplace perks and financial security among the workforce.

Financial protection emerged as a top priority for a significant portion of respondents, with 33 percent emphasising the importance of income protection in their job considerations.

Also, 35 percent expressed a desire for generous pension contributions, underlining the increasing significance of long-term financial planning for employees.

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential daily HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Weekday HR updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

Flexible working is prioritised

When evaluating non-financial benefits, the survey highlighted a strong preference for flexibility and well-being support. Nearly half of the respondents (47%) prioritised hybrid and flexible working arrangements, reflecting the shifting dynamics of the modern workplace. Furthermore, 42 percent emphasised the importance of annual leave allowances, while 34 percent sought mental health support and wellness packages.

MetLife UK’s research coincides with the relaunch of its limited term Group Income Protection offering, aimed at providing businesses with cost-effective solutions to support employee well-being. The revamped service not only provides financial assistance during extended absences but also includes additional support services such as virtual GP consultations, early intervention programs, rehabilitation services, and employee assistance programs.

Adrian Matthews, Head of Employee Benefits at MetLife UK, emphasised the evolving role of benefits in attracting and retaining talent. He stated, “Competitive salaries are important, but businesses need to realise that it’s not the only thing candidates think about when assessing job opportunities. Employers need to look beyond paychecks and assess options for wider support and protection to attract and retain the best people.”

The study also underscored the economic implications of employee absence, with UK businesses bearing significant costs associated with absenteeism. On average, organisations with 1,000 employees incur approximately £1.75 million annually due to temporary staff expenses, administrative overheads, lost productivity, recruitment, and training.

Affordable benefits packages

Matthews highlighted the significance of providing affordable yet comprehensive benefits packages in the current employment landscape. “Having the choice of a shorter duration of cover can reduce costs by over 50 percent, protecting employees for ‘the now’, whilst also safeguarding overheads,” he explained.

As employee mobility continues to rise, with nearly one in four respondents planning to leave their current roles within the next 12 months, Matthews emphasised the role of enhanced benefits in attracting top talent. “Employers offering better benefits could mean attracting the best talent,” he concluded, highlighting the importance of adapting to the changing needs and expectations of the workforce.

With the landscape of employment evolving rapidly, the findings of MetLife UK’s research serve as a call to action for businesses to revaluate their employee benefits strategies, prioritising financial security, flexibility, and well-being support to remain competitive in the talent market.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Middle East air disruption leaves UK staff stranded as employers weigh pay and absence decisions

Employers face complex decisions on pay, leave and remote working as travel disruption leaves British staff stranded in the Middle East.

Govt launches gender pay gap and menopause action plans to help women ‘thrive at work’

Employers are encouraged to publish action plans to reduce pay disparities and support staff experiencing menopause under new government measures.

Call for stronger professional standards to rebuild trust in jobs

Professional bodies call for stronger standards and Chartered status to improve trust, accountability and consistency across roles.

Modulr partners with HiBob to streamline payroll payments

Partnership integrates payments automation into payroll workflows to reduce manual processing and improve pay day reliability.
- Advertisement -

Jake Young: Strong workplace connections are the foundation of good leadership

Effective leaders are, understandably, viewed as key to organisational success. Good leaders are felt to improve employee engagement, productivity and retention.

AI reshapes finance jobs as entry-level roles come under pressure

Employers prioritise digital skills over traditional accounting as AI reshapes finance roles and raises concerns over entry-level opportunities.

Must read

Lindsay Gallard: How HR and Legal teams can address AI privacy concerns

AI’s rapid ascent to the top of the technology poses data privacy risks. Only joint approach from HR and Legal departments can tackle this.

Jamie Akhtar: The threat within: cybersecurity risk in the cost-of-living crisis

The threat of cyberattacks today is also on the rise due to other external factors like supply chain fraud or nation-state interference...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you