Regular socials are crucial for peer relationships

-

More than half (54%) of the nation’s office workers say that regular socials are crucial for building strong peer relationships and fostering a positive work environment, a new survey reveals.

Just Eat for Business asked office workers about how often their organisation holds work socials, what aspects they enjoy the most and least about these events, and how crucial they are to fostering productivity and a sense of belonging in the workplace.

For most employees, work socials are crucial for helping them communicate with their colleagues, as they may otherwise struggle to break the ice before asking for support or collaborating with a peer during the working week – particularly if working remotely.

For a majority (46%) of UK’s office workers, the main reason they enjoy work socials is the opportunity to socialise with their colleagues in a non-professional setting.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, for more than a quarter (27%) of workers, office parties are not a time for team building activities as this can restrict socialisation. Other aspects that were less favourable were the obligation to attend (27%), commuting late (23%) and office politics (22%).

 

What are the benefits of regular socials?

Unsurprisingly, 37 percent of workers most enjoy the downtime from work, and being able to relax and have fun when it comes to office parties and work socials, whilst 37 percent enjoy the free food and drinks provided, and a quarter like finishing the working day earlier.

It is no surprise then that 39 percent of those surveyed wish that their organisation scheduled more work socials – such as a team-building excursion, after-work drinks or a catered lunch.

Just Eat for Business asked office workers about how often their organisation holds work socials, what aspects they enjoy the most and least about these events, and how crucial they are to fostering productivity and a sense of belonging in the workplace.

For most employees, work socials are crucial for helping them communicate with their colleagues, as they may otherwise struggle to break the ice before asking for support or collaborating with a peer during the working week – particularly if working remotely.

Robin Dunbar, Psychologist at the University of Oxford, comments on the survey findings: “This whole process of creating a bonded community depends on engagement in various social activities – such as eating together – and that just creates a sense of belonging.

“Regular work socialisation has huge knock-on consequences for your physical and mental well-being, by virtue of forming friendships and fostering a sense of company loyalty.”

Mark Ephgrave, Managing Director at Just Eat for Business, weighs in: “It’s no secret that work socials are a great way for colleagues to build connections and break the ice, but it’s possible that employers don’t realise just how crucial they are for fostering a friendly work environment.

“Improving company culture has been a key focal point for many over the last two years, and providing regular opportunities to socialise – such as a catered-for lunch or after-work dinner – is an easy way to promote socialisation in a positive and professional context.”

Other findings from the survey included that most organisations only hold two team events a year, with the Christmas Party being the most common reason for doing so.

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Christine Husbands: Are All Mental Health Support Services fit for purpose?

Most companies have at least one mental health support service in place for their employees, writes Christine Husbands, but employers need to ask "are our mental health support services fit for purpose?"  

Ewan Carr: Staying mindful of reasonable adjustments during COVID-19

"There is a duty on employers to make reasonable adjustments if the employee is classed as disabled under the EqA and is placed at a ‘substantial disadvantage’ in comparison with persons who are not disabled."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you