HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Is the CV dead?

-

The majority of job candidates still see the CV and in-person interview as essential when applying for a job, according to new research from Tribepad.

This comes as counter to campaigns to remove the CV, which can be deemed to be bias, and the growth of remote interviews due to the pandemic.

Two-thirds (67%) of respondents say an in-person interview is important or essential, and three in five that a CV is (61%). Although there are moves to try to make hiring more based on skills and aptitude, only a third believe assessments (35%) and assignments or tasks (34%) are important.

Half (50%) of 18-24-year-olds believe that a CV is needed, rising to 66 percent of 35-44-year-olds. Only 56 percent of senior leaders feel positive that the CV is an important part of the hiring process, compared to 67 percent in entry-level positions. Women are more likely than men to say informal conversations are of benefit – 54 percent vs 49 percent – perhaps challenging the notion that job offers are made on the golf course.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Whilst the industry may be ready to move forward, there is a disconnect between what recruiters deem to be important and what candidates believe to be.

When applying for a job, candidates believe the following to be important or essential:

●       In-person interview – 67 %

●        Having a CV – 61 %

●        Interview with line manager – 59 %

●        Application form – 58 %

●        References – 55 %

●        Informal conversations – 51 %

●        Interview with executive leadership team – 37 %

●        Assessments/tests – 35 %

●        Interview with HR – 35 %

●        Tasks/assignments – 34 %

●        Telephone interview – 31 %

●        Video interview – 30 %

Dean Sadler, CEO of Tribepad says: 

“We spend so much time trying to find solutions that work for the industry, but we need to also stop and think about what candidates want. It’s surprising that the CV is still so favoured, given that it can perpetuate bias. It indicates that we still do many things in recruitment ‘just because we always have’ and maybe we need to be braver and challenge that.  The fact that two-thirds want an in-person interview, even though hybrid working is so common, shows the importance of cultural fit and human relationships. At Tribepad we are passionate about bringing the tech and human elements together, to enable people to get great jobs.”

Tribepad’s previous research Stop The Bias found that eight out of 10 candidates think that recruitment would be fairer if it remained anonymous, and 77 percent do not believe that diversity data is being used for their benefit. When Tribepad worked with Coventry City Council to help improve diversity in their recruitment process through anonymous applications they saw a 117 percent increase in the number of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic candidates.

Yet candidates believe a CV is essential. It is time to reconsider our processes and find a system that is comfortable, fair and valuable for all.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Ruth Bamforth: 10 tips for successful auto-enrolment

By 1st February 2018, all employers must have complied with their automatic enrolment duties. Ruth Bamforth breaks down the process.

Seren Trewavas: A guide to identifying High Potentials

As organisations battled through a tough economy of recent...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you