How employers are missing the mark with employee benefits

-

How employers are missing the mark with employee benefits

Almost half of employers do not measure how useful their benefits are to staff.

According to new research by Group Risk Development (GRiD), the group risk protection industry body, 42 per cent of companies do not measure staff appreciation of benefits.

Typically, benefits that are offered to staff include perks such as gym memberships, free food and beverages in the office, health insurance, and dental plans.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, GriD insists that companies which are failing to measure staff reaction to these benefits are “missing a trick” as they are disregarding a vital tool for recruiting new staff and retaining valued employees.

The advantages of measuring staff appreciation give employers insight, this shows which benefits are understood and if they have any value for the employee. As well as making staff feel engaged and more appreciative towards the benefits that they do receive.

Considering the amount of time and resources that are used to offer benefits to staff, GRiD believes it is in the employer’s best interest to figure out which benefits are relevant and valued, both to the workforce overall and also to specific demographics.

Additionally, asking staff which benefits they like and use will make them feel listened to. Not only this but statistics show that asking these questions leads to greater staff appreciation of the benefits offered. Of the companies that do measure staff appreciation, over half (55 per cent) believe that their staff do value the benefits offered. Conversely, of those companies who do not measure staff appreciation of benefits, only a quarter (25 per cent) believe that staff value the benefits offered.

According to research by Gallagher, a global insurance consulting services firm, despite 72 per cent of UK organisations expressing their intention to enhance the benefits they are offering, only one fifth (20 per cent) of organisations allow their workforce to customise their individual benefit packages. Gallagher’s report states that employers should “trust and empower employees to make decisions that are right for them, their team and their work.”

Nick Burns, CEO at Gallagher’s employee benefits consulting division, UK, said:

It’s long been accepted that the brand experience an organisation creates — the way it looks, feels and acts on the outside — is vital to attracting new business. A shift that many don’t yet recognise is how it looks, feels and acts on the inside is now just as important.

Katharine Moxham, spokesperson for GRiD, said:

The more that companies understand which benefits resonate with their staff, the easier it is for them to make decisions about future benefits.

When employers don’t measure how much their benefits are valued, they’re only really doing half a job. Offering them is one thing, but it’s crucial that employers know which ones are adding value to their company.

Understanding what staff need is key to ensuring that what’s offered is relevant.

We’d also encourage employers to talk to their advisers about help they can give in this area. Advisers see it as important that the benefits they recommend are appreciated and being utilised by employees. They often have tried-and-tested ways to help employers with the seemingly onerous task of investigating the relevance of benefits.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

David Hassell: 5 ways HR can help employees harness their inner genius

When you hire new team members, the transition from...

Gary Cattermole: Is it the end of the office romance?

Gary Cattermole discusses the issues that can arise as a result of workplace relationships and offers suggestions about how they can be effectively managed.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you