Attitudes are changing towards part-time work

-

A groundbreaking post-pandemic study conducted by social enterprise Timewise has shattered the long-standing myth that part-time workers are inherently unambitious.

The report, titled A Question of Time, surveyed 4,000 workers in the UK, providing a comprehensive look at the state of part-time employment in the country.

As of now, part-time workers constitute a quarter of the UK’s workforce, encompassing a staggering 8 million individuals.

Timewise’s research reveals that 38 percent of women in employment opt for part-time work, in stark contrast to 14 percent of men. Additionally, 43 percent of workers aged 50 and above embrace part-time schedules.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The study indicates a significant shift in attitudes towards part-time workers. For years, part-time employment has been unfairly linked to a lack of ambition, often considered suitable only for junior roles.

The report highlights a pivotal turning point, with 50 percent of respondents now disagreeing with the notion that part-time workers are unambitious, while only 23 percent maintain this outdated perspective.

Persistent challenges still remain

Nevertheless, the research brings to light persistent challenges for part-time workers. Although more people recognise their ambition, there remains a prevailing perception that part-time roles impede career progression. Almost half of UK workers (46%) agree that part-time work limits career advancement, with 32 percent expressing uncertainty on the matter.

Notably, managers, often holding the key to flexible work arrangements, are conflicted on the issue. While 40 percent of managers are open to considering part-time options in the future, 53 percent view part-time work as a barrier to career progression, adding complexity to the landscape.

Demographic nuances further complicate the narrative. Women, more than men, often opt for part-time work due to caregiving responsibilities, with 32 percent of female part-time workers citing caregiving as a reason. Men, on the other hand, are 16 percentage points more likely to perceive part-time workers as less ambitious than their full-time counterparts.

The study also reveals variations among ethnic groups, with respondents from Asian minority ethnic groups more likely to believe that part-time work limits career progression compared to their white counterparts (58% vs. 45%).

The report concludes with recommendations supported by major corporations such as Diageo, Lloyds Banking Group, and Phoenix Group:

  1. Advocate for a range of flexible working arrangements for all roles.
  2. Integrate part-time work into equality, diversity, and inclusion strategies.
  3. Promote job sharing as a key solution for making part-time options available in senior roles.

Dr. Sarah Dauncey, who led the research, emphasises the need for businesses to adopt a more dynamic and inclusive approach to working hours. “Businesses need to listen to the voices shared in our study and consider how to take a more dynamic and inclusive approach to working hours, enabling people to dial up and down their working hours at different life stages and have more choice and control.”

Phoenix Group’s Cath Sermon echoes these sentiments, urging employers to take the recommended actions seriously. “There is growing, but unmet demand for part-time work, which is vital if we want to help people enjoy the benefits of working while also managing their health, caring for family, and other activities that are important to them.”

The report calls for a re-evaluation of entrenched perceptions surrounding part-time work, positioning it as a crucial aspect of a modern and inclusive workforce.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Daniel Stander: When AI costs jobs – navigating workplace displacement lawfully and responsibly

More and more workers are worried that AI will lead to job losses, with entry-level and junior posts perceived as first in the firing line.

Maggie Berry: How can HR departments promote gender equality in the boardroom?

HR departments could have a big role to play...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you