AI ‘apocalypse’ puts 8 million jobs at risk

-

A report released by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) reveals that as many as eight million jobs could be at risk due to the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI).

The report highlights a critical juncture for the UK’s economic future, urging the government to enact proactive measures to mitigate the potential fallout.

According to the IPPR analysis, the UK stands at a “sliding doors” moment regarding the adoption of generative AI, with profound implications for the labour market.

The report delineates two distinct waves of AI adoption: the ongoing first wave and a more extensive second wave poised to deeply integrate AI technology into various industries.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Alarmingly, the report suggests that without intervention, up to 59 percent of tasks performed by workers could be susceptible to automation by AI.

Which jobs are most at risk?

During the initial wave, back-office operations, entry-level positions, and part-time jobs are deemed most vulnerable to disruption. Roles such as secretarial, customer service, and administrative positions are particularly at risk, with women and young people disproportionately affected due to their higher representation in these sectors. Additionally, individuals with lower wages are identified as particularly susceptible to job displacement by AI.

The IPPR report paints a stark picture of a worst-case scenario for the second wave of AI adoption, predicting a staggering 7.9 million job losses without any corresponding gains in GDP. However, it also offers a glimmer of hope, suggesting that with proactive intervention from both government and industry, significant economic benefits could be realised. In the best-case scenario, where jobs are augmented to work alongside AI, the UK could see a remarkable 13 percent boost to GDP, equivalent to around £306 billion annually.

Carsten Jung, senior economist at the IPPR, emphasised the pivotal role of strategic decision-making in managing the impact of AI. He stressed that while AI presents opportunities for economic growth, its unchecked implementation could lead to widespread disruption. Jung urged stakeholders to seize the opportunity to shape the trajectory of AI adoption, emphasising the importance of government policies, employer initiatives, and union involvement in safeguarding workers.

A job-centric industrial strategy

The IPPR report recommends a job-centric industrial strategy for AI, advocating for tax incentives, subsidies, and regulatory changes to support workers and ensure human oversight in critical sectors like healthcare. Despite the gravity of the findings, the UK government has yet to introduce specific legislation addressing the rise of AI. However, recent announcements of significant investments in AI research hubs signal a recognition of the issue’s importance.

Responding to the report, a spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology (DSIT) emphasised the speculative nature of the predictions, citing reports suggesting AI’s potential to create new jobs and drive economic growth. The government reiterated its commitment to assessing AI’s impact on various sectors and investing in skills development initiatives to prepare for the jobs of the future.

As the UK stands at the precipice of an AI-driven future, the IPPR report serves as a clarion call for decisive action. With the right policies and strategies in place, the nation can harness the transformative power of AI while safeguarding its workforce against the looming specter of widespread job displacement. The stakes are high, and the time for action is now.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

John Duckworth: How to handle a new era of co-working

Co-working, where different businesses work together in a shared office space, is growing in the UK at a rapid rate. By 2018 it is estimated that the number of members using co-working spaces globally will have reached one million. In addition to the more traditional static office, firms of all sizes, from start-ups to big corporate's like Orange and IBM, have started to pursue flexible and agile working arrangements that now include co-working. The challenge now for HR teams is how to manage this potentially new territory and to consider how changes to their company’s real estate strategy to include co-working can enhance business performance.

Social Media – the new diet pill?

  With any area of dissatisfaction there’s a natural human...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you