Employment tribunal fees “put a hurdle in front of workers seeking justice”

-

In a press release issued on Monday, the TUC highlighted its concerns, asserting that such fees would place a significant obstacle in the path of workers seeking justice for issues like discrimination, unfair dismissal, or withheld wages.

The union body expressed apprehension that the proposed fees would favour “bad bosses” and empower them to disregard the rights of their staff.

The Supreme Court had invalidated a previous tribunal fees regime in 2017, citing its adverse impact on access to justice.

Despite this, the government appears determined to revisit the issue, prompting criticism from the TUC.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak condemned the government’s stance, stating, “This is another example of ministers taking the side of bad bosses, not working people.” Nowak emphasised that the government’s proposal would exacerbate the challenges faced by workers seeking justice and underscored the importance of protecting the rights of those facing discrimination or unfair treatment.

Additional barriers

Nowak cited the recent high-profile case involving P&O Ferries, where the company’s abrupt dismissal of 800 workers prompted minimal government action. He argued that introducing fees for employment tribunals would create additional barriers for individuals seeking justice during their most vulnerable moments.

“The Tories have already tried this and failed,” Nowak pointed out, referencing a previous attempt to introduce tribunal fees that resulted in a significant drop in claims. The Supreme Court had intervened, deeming the fees an interference with access to justice.

“Working people shouldn’t be picking up the bill for exploitative employers’ poor behaviour. Employment tribunal fees are just an invitation for bad bosses to ride roughshod over workers,” Nowak added.

The TUC’s strong opposition to the government’s consultation signals a potential showdown between workers’ rights advocates and the authorities, with the outcome likely to shape the landscape of employment tribunals in the coming months.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Menopause support gaps push women out of jobs as ‘masking’ takes toll

Women consider leaving jobs as menopause symptoms go unsupported, with many hiding their condition at work.

Workers ‘ignore AI tools and stick with manual tasks’ despite heavy investment

Employees are avoiding workplace AI tools and reverting to manual tasks, raising concerns about trust, usability and the value of tech investment.

Victor Riparbelli on AI boosting the value of people

“AI will make great human communicators even more valuable than before.”

Up to 28,000 employees affected by paper-based data breaches

Thousands of workers affected by paper-based data incidents as organisations miss reporting deadlines and overlook offline risks.
- Advertisement -

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Must read

Gareth Tancred: Harnessing HR – Inclusive access for all

With "unacceptable" levels of access to high street shops and businesses, how do we ensure the needs of people with disabilities are being met?

Jackie Penlington: An employer’s checklist-Preparing for the end of UK’s Brexit transition period

"With the Brexit transition period ending in a matter of weeks and a new immigration system in place, HR teams will face significant changes ahead."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you