Employment law reforms ‘a licence to treat people badly’

-

Employment Law BasicsThe government’s recently announced reforms to employment laws have been labelled a licence for employers “to treat people badly” by a leading legal expert.

Last week, business secretary Vince Cable announced that the government is to adopt several reforms proposed by venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft in a report published in May.

These include a cap on the amount of compensation employees can receive for unfair dismissals and the introduction of fees for taking employment disputes to tribunal.

While some have claimed the reforms could help remove employers’ fear of litigation and encourage them to take on new staff, others say they represent a serious erosion of employee rights.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Writing in the Guardian this week, Anya Palmer, a barrister specialising in employment law at Old Square Chambers, argued the reforms give employers scope to mistreat staff and could possibly lead to workplace discrimination going unpunished.

“It’s a licence to treat people badly and still pay less,” she commented.

Ms Palmer noted that the cap on compensation would affect lower paid workers in particular, with the proposal being to reduce the maximum compensatory award from its current level of £72,300 down to median pay (£26,000) or one year’s salary, whichever is lower.

“So the cap on compensation would be slashed by two thirds, more for low earners, because half of all workers earn less than £26,000. For someone who earns only £15,000, the cap would be £15,000.”

However, fees for taking an unfair dismissal claim to tribunal could have an even bigger impact by deterring staff from challenging their employers even in genuine cases of discrimination.

“For bigger claims such as unfair dismissal or discrimination the total fees will be £1,200,” she said.

“There can be no doubt the aim is to deter claims, and the fees will undoubtedly present an insurmountable hurdle for many claimants.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

What rights do employees have during a heatwave?

Jane Crosby from law firm Hart Brown discusses what rights employees have, and what duties of care an employer has, to ensure the health of everyone in the workplace as temperatures soar.

Heidi Thompson: Competition and cost of living mean employers must enhance their offer

"Like it or not - employees hold much more power than they used to and they have far greater expectations of their employers because it is a buyer’s market," says Heidi Thompson.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you