Call for action to cut bogus tribunal claims

-


A recent Freedom of Information request sent to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) by an employment lawyer has confirmed that there is no central system for monitoring employment tribunal claims.

Gordon Turner of Gordon Employment Lawyers now plans to meet with the MOJ to discuss this issue – he argues that the lack of central monitoring means that serial litigants who make weak or vexatious claims are enabled to do so repeatedly because there is no way for these patterns to be flagged up unless the Register of Decisions is checked manually.

In the FOI request Turner asked the MoJ whether it could tell him if any claimants had made more than 50, 100 and 200 age discrimination claims in the last three years. He also asked for the maximum number of age discrimination claims brought by an individual in the last three years.

He said employers often still use problematic language such as “school leaver”, “recent graduate” and “agile worker” and vexatious claimants latch on to the possibility of bringing a discrimination claim.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The FOI response said that the MoJ does not hold this information in a “collated and accessible format” and that to compile it would be too expensive.

Turner said: “I am going to write to the MOJ and take up the offer of a meeting. I don’t think this is about a narrow FOI interpretation of cost but rather the broader picture of how the employment tribunal system is used and viewed. The costs to business and the taxpayer from claims being brought or persisting in the system when they should be spotted and excluded at the initial stages is something I would have thought the MOJ or the Government would investigate.”

Earlier this year a claim by John Berry for age discrimination against a recruitment agency was struck out after he failed to corroborate his identity as directed to. The judgment noted that it appeared that Mr Berry had previously brought 50 similar claims against various employers and described him as an “experienced litigant”. Mr Berry has not attended a any of the tribunal hearings.

Latest news

‘Job centre in your pocket’ plan raises questions over role of AI in employment support

The government's AI-powered employment assistant has sparked debate about how technology should support jobseekers while maintaining trust.

Employers urged to spot gambling harms during World Cup

Employers are being urged to watch for gambling-related harm at work as the 2026 World Cup brings weeks of daytime matches and betting activity.

Habits for health: small changes that lead to bigger gains

From walking meetings to better sleep routines, simple habits can improve health, wellbeing and performance across the workplace.

Jeanette Wheeler: The business case for purpose-led leadership

Public scrutiny on businesses and societal expectations are putting pressure on leaders to demonstrate that purpose runs deeper than profit.
- Advertisement -

Britain’s biggest retailers cut 18,000 jobs as employment costs rise

Rising wage bills and tax costs are prompting retailers to rethink hiring as they seek savings across their operations.

Georges Elhedery on AI and job losses

“We all know generative AI will destroy certain jobs and will create new jobs.”

Must read

Leanne Maskell: What HR can do to protect neurodivergent employees from workplace harassment and bullying

The fact that one in five neurodivergent employees experience harassment or bullying at work should ring serious alarm bells.

Anton Roe: The Work Programme – what effects will it have?

The Government’s exciting announcement about ‘The Work Programme’ has...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you