Call for action to cut bogus tribunal claims

-


A recent Freedom of Information request sent to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) by an employment lawyer has confirmed that there is no central system for monitoring employment tribunal claims.

Gordon Turner of Gordon Employment Lawyers now plans to meet with the MOJ to discuss this issue – he argues that the lack of central monitoring means that serial litigants who make weak or vexatious claims are enabled to do so repeatedly because there is no way for these patterns to be flagged up unless the Register of Decisions is checked manually.

In the FOI request Turner asked the MoJ whether it could tell him if any claimants had made more than 50, 100 and 200 age discrimination claims in the last three years. He also asked for the maximum number of age discrimination claims brought by an individual in the last three years.

He said employers often still use problematic language such as “school leaver”, “recent graduate” and “agile worker” and vexatious claimants latch on to the possibility of bringing a discrimination claim.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The FOI response said that the MoJ does not hold this information in a “collated and accessible format” and that to compile it would be too expensive.

Turner said: “I am going to write to the MOJ and take up the offer of a meeting. I don’t think this is about a narrow FOI interpretation of cost but rather the broader picture of how the employment tribunal system is used and viewed. The costs to business and the taxpayer from claims being brought or persisting in the system when they should be spotted and excluded at the initial stages is something I would have thought the MOJ or the Government would investigate.”

Earlier this year a claim by John Berry for age discrimination against a recruitment agency was struck out after he failed to corroborate his identity as directed to. The judgment noted that it appeared that Mr Berry had previously brought 50 similar claims against various employers and described him as an “experienced litigant”. Mr Berry has not attended a any of the tribunal hearings.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Suzy Barber: Now they do know it’s Christmas

Organise a day of corporate volunteering on the same day as your Christmas do and you’ll have a real reason to celebrate, says Suzy Barber.

Ian Davidson: The Russian Billionaire’s story

I was watching a fascinating program on TV this...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you