Businesses planning furlough redundancies need to start now, law firm warns

-

Despite the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme coming to a close at the end of September, lawyers warn that planning redundancies should begin now. 

New research published by the Government shows that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme has supported a cumulative total of 11.6 million jobs since March 2020.

However, with new changes to employer contributions already coming into force, law firm Nelsons has warned that businesses should start planning ahead and thinking carefully about redundancies.

Laura Kearsley, partner and solicitor specialising in employment law at Nelsons, discusses the minimum consultation periods which must take place before redundancies take effect:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Faced with uncertain trading times for many businesses and now partial financial responsibility for all employees, many employers will need to review their workforce and requirements to consider whether current levels of staffing are sustainable.

If an employer intends to make more than 20 people redundant, this triggers collective consultation requirements, including minimum consultation periods during which redundancy dismissals cannot take effect. The consultation period for employers who anticipate making 100 or more people redundant is 45 days and for those anticipating making between 20 and 99 redundancies it is 30.

As such, Ms. Kearsley urges businesses to think about commencing redundancy consultations so they are in a position to make redundancies before the government funding reduces.

This includes complying with the requirements of collective consultations which involve liaising with recognised trade unions or elected employee representatives.

Furthermore, employers that are making any number of employees with more than two years’ continuous service redundant will need to adhere to minimum requirements in terms of consultation and meetings.

Ms. Kearsley clarifies that the legal obligations on employers who are thinking about redundancies will depend on how many staff they are planning to let go. She stated:

If you anticipate that you will have to make 20 or more people redundant at the same location within a set period, you will have a legal obligation to consult with employee representatives (these could be trade union representatives or colleagues elected for this purpose).

Regardless of the numbers, you should also follow a fair process where you meet with employees that are at risk of redundancy and listen to any suggestions the employees have for avoiding redundancies.

As such, Ms. Kearsley outlines the importance of consulting properly with staff at risk of redundancy before reaching a final decision.

This will involve holding meetings with employees to discuss the situation in more detail. At the end of the consultation period, employers will need to confirm who they are choosing to make redundant and whether an alternative to redundancy for certain roles has been found.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that millions of people and their employers will be affected by the phasing out of the furlough scheme, with rising redundancies taking place over the summer months.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Catharine Geddes: Maternity leave – keeping in touch or cut off?

Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has recently told the...

Darren Timmins: The importance of cultural fit when selecting your next business leader

Here at Otravida we know the importance of selecting...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you