Businesses planning furlough redundancies need to start now, law firm warns

-

Despite the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme coming to a close at the end of September, lawyers warn that planning redundancies should begin now. 

New research published by the Government shows that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme has supported a cumulative total of 11.6 million jobs since March 2020.

However, with new changes to employer contributions already coming into force, law firm Nelsons has warned that businesses should start planning ahead and thinking carefully about redundancies.

Laura Kearsley, partner and solicitor specialising in employment law at Nelsons, discusses the minimum consultation periods which must take place before redundancies take effect:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Faced with uncertain trading times for many businesses and now partial financial responsibility for all employees, many employers will need to review their workforce and requirements to consider whether current levels of staffing are sustainable.

If an employer intends to make more than 20 people redundant, this triggers collective consultation requirements, including minimum consultation periods during which redundancy dismissals cannot take effect. The consultation period for employers who anticipate making 100 or more people redundant is 45 days and for those anticipating making between 20 and 99 redundancies it is 30.

As such, Ms. Kearsley urges businesses to think about commencing redundancy consultations so they are in a position to make redundancies before the government funding reduces.

This includes complying with the requirements of collective consultations which involve liaising with recognised trade unions or elected employee representatives.

Furthermore, employers that are making any number of employees with more than two years’ continuous service redundant will need to adhere to minimum requirements in terms of consultation and meetings.

Ms. Kearsley clarifies that the legal obligations on employers who are thinking about redundancies will depend on how many staff they are planning to let go. She stated:

If you anticipate that you will have to make 20 or more people redundant at the same location within a set period, you will have a legal obligation to consult with employee representatives (these could be trade union representatives or colleagues elected for this purpose).

Regardless of the numbers, you should also follow a fair process where you meet with employees that are at risk of redundancy and listen to any suggestions the employees have for avoiding redundancies.

As such, Ms. Kearsley outlines the importance of consulting properly with staff at risk of redundancy before reaching a final decision.

This will involve holding meetings with employees to discuss the situation in more detail. At the end of the consultation period, employers will need to confirm who they are choosing to make redundant and whether an alternative to redundancy for certain roles has been found.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that millions of people and their employers will be affected by the phasing out of the furlough scheme, with rising redundancies taking place over the summer months.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Felix Obadaki: A recruitment strategy to identify “right fit” candidates

"Whilst business acumen is important, hiring people that fit the team is more crucial to how successful a candidate will be."

Michael Bronstein: TUPE transfers and outsourcing – a meaty question

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) continue to generate difficult questions, more than 35 years after they were originally introduced in 1981.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you