Working from home should be reinstated, Government told

-

The Government is facing pressure from healthcare professionals to reinstate safety measures such as working from home as the number of COVID-19 cases continues to climb. 

Working from home, as well as other measures including wearing face masks, should become mandatory once again, the British Medical Association have argued.

These policies fall under a contingency plan drawn up by Government ministers earlier this year, entitled ‘Plan B’.

This warning comes as the UK recorded over 40,000 daily COVID infections for eight days in a row.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

BMA council chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul criticised the Government’s approach to dealing with the rising number of cases:

It is willfully negligent of the Westminster Government not to be taking any further action to reduce the spread of infection, such as mandatory mask wearing, physical distancing and ventilation requirements in high-risk settings, particularly indoor crowded spaces.

These are measures that are the norm in many other nations.

However, Health Secretary Sajid Javid stated “at this point”, the Plan B measures would not be re-introduced.

Despite this, Asha Kumar, Employment Partner at Keystone Law stated this could throw up some key problems for many employers who have spent months transitioning staff back into the workplace:

The increasing pressure on the Government to implement its Plan B in response to rising COVID rates and with the difficult winter months ahead, creates somewhat of a predicament for employers given that many have spent months gearing up to transition their workforce back into the office on either a 3:2 flexi-agile basis or in some cases, on a full-time basis.

Many employers are already grappling with some reluctant employees who simply don’t want to return to the office or because they genuinely hold concerns due to COVID-19.

Nonetheless, Ms. Kumar explained that employers still have a duty of care towards staff and have obligations to ensure safety in the workplace in light of this change in circumstances:

The onus is very much on employers to put in place steps and measures to ensure they comply with their obligations. What does this mean for employers?

Firstly, employers should revisit their COVID-19 risk assessments and ensure that any risks are reasonably mitigated against.

This may include re-introducing a form of social distancing within the office, mask wearing, increasing hand sanitisation stations and/or improving ventilation.

Employers should think about putting in place an “outbreak” procedure which would inform managers of the steps to be taken in the case of notified cases occurring in the workplace.

Further, employees should be informed of the process to be follow where they display any COVID-19 symptoms, which may require them to work from home until they have a negative PRC Test result.

Finally, in addition to this, employers may also want to rethink whether their staff should be required to have regular lateral flows before attending the office and/or whether vaccinations should be mandated for their staff, although both of these options would require navigating through complex employment law challenges.

Although it is currently unclear at present whether working from home measures will become mandatory once again, it has been outlined by the Government previously as a vital strategy which could be used to reduce transmissions of the virus.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Mike Hibbs: Sick leave, keeping your processes healthy

Two million people could benefit from the proposed change to SSP.

Jamie Carlisle: Is it time for a recruitment revamp?

Our recent Revamping Recruitment in the UK research found...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you