HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Will the cost-of-living crisis impact plans for a ‘phased retirement’?

-

Research from Legal & General has found that 34 percent of pre-retirees (those aged 55+ who are still in some form of work) have already started phasing into retirement – equating to 3.3 million employees.

The study reinforces the idea that retirement is no longer a line in the sand.

Almost half (48%) of all employees aged 55+ expect that they will cut down the amount they work rather than completely stop, with one in seven (14%) planning to wind down in the next year.

Many people want to take the phased retirement route by reducing their hours, so they can keep their job but lessen their stress (37%.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, most people have revealed they are making the decision because they simply cannot afford to retire fully (44%).

What is a phased approach to retirement?

On average, over half (54%) of all people who are taking a phased approach to retirement are working 15+ hours less every month, consequently earning £9,150 less every year.

As a result, many expect to have to adjust their lifestyle (38%), and some even anticipate they could struggle with meeting the cost of household essentials (17%).

Despite the intention to slow down at work, the cost-of-living crisis has had an impact, with one in 10 people who had begun to phase into retirement having to increase their work commitments again. In addition, two-fifths (40%) of people who anticipated gradually moving into retirement in the next five years now worry living costs might mean this plan is not possible.

What about FTAs?

Legal & General’s internal data shows the average income on an average pension pot (£73K) for a fixed term annuity (FTAs) taken out by someone aged 55 is £9,000 per year – which could bridge the £9,150 income gap caused by a phased approach to retirement.

An FTA lets you use your pension pot to buy a guaranteed income, but for a specific period of time, with a lump sum at the end. This gives greater flexibility for those who want to bridge their income until another source of pension income kicks in.

Lorna Shah, Managing Director of Retail Retirement, Legal & General Retail comments:

“The number of pre-retirees considering a gradual or phased move into full retirement shows how much the perception of later life has changed in recent years. However people choose to approach retirement, it’s important they see it as something that should be actively managed, and not something they already feel they are ‘in’ or have ‘done’.

“For those wanting to keep their options open, while also looking for ways to supplement their income, flexible products such as fixed term annuities can play an important role. They provide a guaranteed income for a set time – in some cases as little as three years, helping to bridge any potential gap in salary.

“Most people find it challenging to navigate retirement at the best of times. With the increased pressures applied by the cost-of-living crisis, their money must go further than it ever has done. Ultimately, the key thing is to make sure people are making well informed decisions about what works best for them.”

 

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Rachel Arkle: We have an entitlement to be well at work

Some UK firms, it seems, remain resistant to taking wellbeing seriously. Despite growing employee calls for action, certain organisations remain limited in their belief that health is good for business. Such mindsets not only deprioritise wellbeing but are also enabling worrying behaviours and cultures to emerge that actively discourage people's ability to look after themselves.

Putting Policy into Practice

Getting people to read your Health & Safety Policy is difficult, but persuading them to put it into practice can be even more problematical. Duncan Spencer tells us more.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you