HRreview Header

Poor health at work costs UK economy £138 billion annually

-

A recent study conducted by Vitality, the health and life insurer, reveals that poor health among British workers is responsible for a staggering £138.3 billion loss to the UK economy each year.

The study, part of the 2023 Britain’s Healthiest Workplace survey, underscores the significant impact of health issues on both employee well-being and national productivity.

The research indicates that British businesses lose an average of 49.7 days per employee annually due to poor health, translating to the substantial economic loss.

Musculoskeletal conditions, depression, and poor sleep quality emerge as the primary culprits affecting productivity across the UK.

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential daily HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Weekday HR updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

According to Vitality’s findings, UK workers are losing an average of 6.1 days per year due to formal absence, with the majority of lost working hours stemming from employees not working efficiently due to health-related issues. Mental and physical health problems, such as musculoskeletal conditions, depression, and poor sleep quality, result in employees losing nearly one day per week (43.6 days annually).

A shift away from the impact of Covid-19

The study highlights a positive shift from the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on UK productivity. In 2023, reduced levels of burnout (27.1% lower), job dissatisfaction (10.6% lower), and improved relaxation for home-workers (43% lower) are observed.

Analysing the impact of different health conditions on workplace productivity, mental health issues emerge as the most significant contributor to reduced efficiency. Those at risk of depression, fatigue, and burnout lose 151 percent, 141 percent, and 120 percent more productive days, respectively, compared to their healthier counterparts. Physical health issues, such as poor diet, obesity, musculoskeletal conditions, and lack of physical activity, also contribute significantly, increasing lost time by 14 percent, 54 percent, and 28 percent, respectively.

What about productivity?

The study reveals a generational divide in the impact of health on productivity, with those under 30 losing an average of 59.7 days per year compared to those over 50 who lose an average of 36.3 days a year – a 64 percent difference. Despite reporting better physical health, younger employees exhibit higher levels of mental health concerns, including burnout (17.0%), depression (14.6%), and fatigue (55.6%).

Surprisingly, the study finds that despite the evident correlation between health and productivity, employees feel their workplace culture does not adequately support their well-being.

One in five employees feels their manager does not care about their health, with lower earners being 86 percent more likely to feel unsupported compared to their higher-earning colleagues.

What can employers do to help?

Companies are making efforts to address this issue, offering an average of 47 health interventions, yet only 25 percent of surveyed individuals reported utilising these measures. The study emphasises the need for a targeted approach to ensure both employees and employers benefit from a healthy workforce.

Neville Koopowitz, CEO of Vitality, stated, “Our research clearly shows the impact of health and wellbeing on productivity in the UK, and the implications for the UK economy are concerning. Businesses must recognise the importance and impact of facilitating a healthy workplace, one that acknowledges employees’ mental and physical health needs.” Koopowitz emphasises the need for meaningful action, education, and support to address the complex challenges facing UK employers and ultimately benefit both businesses and the wider economy.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Middle East air disruption leaves UK staff stranded as employers weigh pay and absence decisions

Employers face complex decisions on pay, leave and remote working as travel disruption leaves British staff stranded in the Middle East.

Govt launches gender pay gap and menopause action plans to help women ‘thrive at work’

Employers are encouraged to publish action plans to reduce pay disparities and support staff experiencing menopause under new government measures.

Call for stronger professional standards to rebuild trust in jobs

Professional bodies call for stronger standards and Chartered status to improve trust, accountability and consistency across roles.

Modulr partners with HiBob to streamline payroll payments

Partnership integrates payments automation into payroll workflows to reduce manual processing and improve pay day reliability.
- Advertisement -

Jake Young: Strong workplace connections are the foundation of good leadership

Effective leaders are, understandably, viewed as key to organisational success. Good leaders are felt to improve employee engagement, productivity and retention.

AI reshapes finance jobs as entry-level roles come under pressure

Employers prioritise digital skills over traditional accounting as AI reshapes finance roles and raises concerns over entry-level opportunities.

Must read

Oliver Watson: Why diversity holds the key to your organisation’s ROI

It’s no secret that there is increasing pressure on businesses to employ a diverse workforce and with good reason. Over the past few years, while there have been steps in the right direction – for instance, FTSE 100 companies reaching more than 25% representation of women on boards – there is certainly more to be done across the board for diversity (and not just on gender parity).

Barry Ross: Positive action versus positive discrimination & what this means for HR

"There is an argument about whether the Rooney Rule should be adopted on a widespread basis in the UK and how that balances the nuance between positive discrimination and positive action."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you