More boards embrace the idea of gender diversity

-

The European Union’s plans to enforce gender diversity quotas on boards are advancing, with calls in the European Parliament for EU-wide legislation to be put in place ensuring minimum female representation of at least 40%on supervisory boards by 2020.

Law firm Eversheds says that whilst plans to impose quotas are still some way off, there is a general acceptance that if member states/companies do not move to a more diverse board structure voluntarily, European legislators will enforce quotas in order to increase the pace of change and ensure greater female representation in listed companies across Europe.

Mark Spinner, partner at Eversheds, commented:

“Gender diversity is generally accepted as a good thing and there are now a number of reports which indicate that there is a positive correlation between greater female representation and company (share price) performance. However, once you look outside of political circles, support levels for the introduction of quotas are low, notably amongst corporates. Research undertaken for the Eversheds Board Report, in which directors were interviewed for their views on the topic, identified only one director who was definitely a supporter of quotas, although the majority were in favour of gender diversity.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“The vast majority of directors are concerned that the introduction of quotas will result in a move away from merit based selection in order to ensure delivery against arbitrary targets. The real issue for companies is ensuring that recruitment criteria which emphasise the importance of achieving the desirable balance of skills and attributes brought by a diverse board are properly set in place. One result of this would be a decreasing importance being placed on ‘previous experience,’ which would likely result in more female candidates coming under consideration.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

John Edmonds: Achieving ROI on training spend with good training delivery

Training budgets are often vulnerable when expenditure is being...

Professor Gordon Wishart: How business can fight cancer

In August 2014 the world marks the 100th anniversary...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you