Is it office banter or bullying?

-

A recent survey by Irwin Mitchell into workplace behaviour found that 32 percent of the UK have experienced bullying disguised as banter.

It also found that 45-54 years-olds are the most likely age group to have experienced this type of bullying  

Workers in the North-West are the most likely to have experienced bullying disguised as banter (37%)

In addition, over 35 percent of women in the UK workplace have experienced bullying disguised as banter

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This poses serious concerns about whether employees can identify unlawful behaviour in the workplace, giving them the right to bring employment claims such as discrimination and constructive dismissal.

Irwin Mitchell wants to raise awareness of the impact such bad behaviour can have on employees and the important measures managers should put in place to safeguard their staff.  

Certain industries are more widely affected by bullying in the workplace disguised as banter: 

A stagggering 50 percent of people in the sports industry have experienced bullying disguised as banter.

The research also found that nearly half of all people working in fine art have experienced bullying disguised as bullying. 

Those who studied music/arts are most likely to experience bullying disguised as banter when they start work (53%). 

Also, 38 percent of people working in accounting/finance have experienced bullying disguised as banter.

In addition, 39 percent of people working in UK hospitality have experienced bullying disguised as banter. 

Deborah Casale employment partner at Irwin Mitchell, says:

“There really is no excuse for treating employees in this way. Whilst some may consider banter to be light-hearted, making jokes at the expense of an employee or making inappropriate comments, can lead to staff feeling uncomfortable in the workplace and in the worst cases make them feel that they have no choice but to leave their position. 

“If an employee is being made to feel they’re not wanted and resigns as a result of an employer’s behaviour, this could be considered “quiet firing.” This can form grounds for constructive dismissal if it breaches the implied term of trust and confidence in the employment relationship and the employee has more than two years of service. If the comments are discriminatory, two years of service are not required. Employees should be aware of their legal rights in these situations and should take advice at an early stage to protect their position – ideally before resigning. Likewise, employers should ensure that staff are properly trained as to what could constitute inappropriate behaviour.” 

Jo Moseley, specialist employment lawyer at Irwin Mitchell adds:

Harassment of a worker occurs when a person engages in unwanted conduct which is related to one of the seven protected characteristics and has the purpose or effect of:

  • Violating the worker’s dignity or
  • Creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment forthat worker. 

“Unwanted conduct covers a wide range of behaviour, including spoken or written words or abuse, imagery, graffiti, physical gestures, facial expressions, mimicry, jokes, pranks and other physical behaviour. The conduct may be blatant (for example, overt bullying), or more subtle (for example, ignoring or marginalising an employee). The word ‘unwanted’ means essentially the same as ‘unwelcome’ or ‘uninvited’. ‘Unwanted’ does not mean that someone must object to the conduct first. Some types of conduct will, self-evidently, be unwanted.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Sidonie Viala: Pay transparency won’t close inequality if negotiation still drives pay

The EU's Pay Transparency Directive is on track to arrive with a simple promise: visibility will bring fairness. But transparency only exposes outcomes.

Calls grow for working from home as fuel shortages loom amid Iran conflict

Remote work is being urged as fuel shortages linked to Middle East conflict threaten commuting, business operations and workforce stability.

Worker denied leave for 25 years wins £400,000 in holiday pay case

A tribunal awards nearly £400,000 to a worker denied annual leave for decades, raising concerns about holiday policies and employer compliance.

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.
- Advertisement -

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Must read

Dhiren Master: Does your sector have healthy attitudes to mental health?

Research still points to a persisting stigma, says the author.

Ally Yates: How to make remote working efficient and effective

Virtual teams and telecommuting are now accepted features of corporate life. The benefits are many: flexible working; cost reduction; increased employee motivation; productivity gains; reduced stress and sickness levels.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you