Stylist fails in attempt to claim wages for time in jail

-

A hairdresser has failed in a bid to force her former employer to pay her wages for the time she was in prison.

Kelly Atkins was jailed for two years in December 2011 and Miss Atkins’ civil claim against her former employer, Hair by Loretta, was rejected at an employment tribunal after she failed to turn up for the hearing, despite staff trying to contact her.

Atkins had demanded £7,000 in back-pay for the nine months she served in prison, but her claims of constructive dismissal were thrown out by Chairman Victoria Wallace at Ashford Employment Tribunal.

Both Miss Atkins and her ex-boss said that Atkins had taken annual leave to attend her trial in December 2011 in written statements to the tribunal, and in other documents submitted, Miss Atkins claimed that her employer made assurances her job was safe before she was convicted.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In her statement, Miss Atkins said of her ex-boss:

“She said no matter what happens I will always have my job.

“I came home on 27 June 2012, and rang Mrs McDonald to ask if I could come back to work and the reply to that was ‘no’.”

However, Mrs McDonald said there was no agreement to keep a job open and that her business was stigmatised by her worker’s conviction.

In a written statement, she told the tribunal:

“The case became national news and was featured on radio, television, newspapers and on the internet.

“Of course, this became a problem for me. Her regular customers deserted the salon.”

Following the hearing, David McDonald, who owns the salon with his wife, said:

“It made us feel absolutely sick. We have gone through absolute hell for the last three months and we’re not healthy people.”

Chairman Victoria Wallace also ruled out an adjournment, saying:

“It seems to me it’s not sensible that we could really sensibly look at it without both parties being here.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Andrew Lawton: Home working leaves employees and their employers vulnerable

In case we needed any further proof that remote working is now a permanent fixture of modern life, recent data from the Office for National Statistics provided it, says Andrew Lawton.

Ian Davidson: Why our benefits products need to be like Sainsbury´s supermarket

Introduction  I was undertaking my weekly grocery shop in my...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you