HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Non-exec directors seeing their fees flatline after 5 years of growth

-

shutterstock_73855507

Non-executive directors in FTSE100 companies are seeing an end to the increases in their fees experienced after the financial crisis, according to a new report by PwC. 

PwC’s research reveals that the base board fees for non-executive director roles in the FTSE100 are beginning to plateau after several years of rises, as companies try to keep pay increases for executives and non-executives more in line with the rest of their employees. 

The median base fee level for FTSE100 chairmen is £361,000 in 2013, which is broadly flat compared to 2012 (£360,000). For FTSE100 non-executive directors the median base fee is £61,000 in 2013, a slight drop from 2012 where the median was £64,000. This follows five years of increases for both FTSE100 chairmen and non-executive directors from a base of £300,000 and £55,000, respectively, in 2009. Fees in FTSE 250 companies have continued to rise over the same period.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Fiona Camenzuli, partner in PwC’s reward team, said: “The role of non-executives has changed dramatically since the financial crisis. The huge increase in risk and regulatory requirements has put non-executive directors firmly in the spotlight and led to many dedicating far more time to the role to properly fulfil their duties. Many non-executive directors felt their pay needed to increase to reflect the time commitment and considerable reputational risk which now accompanies the role.

“Following five years of steady increases, our research suggests non-executive directors’ base fees have stabilised. As with executive pay, companies are keen to show restraint in non-executive directors pay by ensuring any pay rises are not out of kilter with their wider employees. With average employees’ pay increases limited to inflation in many cases, it will be harder for companies to justify a higher increase for non-executive directors.

“The new reporting regime will put further pressure on fee levels for non-executive directors as companies will now have to establish and disclose their policy on fees, which will be subject to a binding vote. Any increases that are inconsistent with the approved policy will be unlawful.”

Despite the restraint shown for non-executive directors’ base fees, those who are members of the remuneration committee continue to see steep rises in their fees. The fees for chairmanship and membership of the remuneration committee for FTSE100 companies have jumped 65% and 140% respectively since 2009. This takes the median fee for a remuneration committee member from £5,000 in 2009 to £12,000 in 2013. 

The median fee for chairing the remuneration committee now stands at around £20,000 per annum in the FTSE100, up from £12,000 in 2009. This is the same level as audit committee chairmanship fees, which remained at £20,000 per annum for a third consecutive year. Membership fees for the audit committee, which had not risen since 2010, have increased by 50%. 

Fiona Camenzuli, partner in PwC’s reward team, said: “It is clear that chairing the remuneration committee is now considered as onerous as chairing the audit committee. The intense spotlight on executive pay means the remuneration committee chair has an extremely difficult balancing act between setting pay levels which satisfy shareholders, company executives, the wider workforce and often the general public. The potential repercussions of getting it wrong are huge so it is no surprise that fees are rising to reflect the increased pressure.”

Latest news

Leading people and culture across a global luxury hospitality brand

A senior HR leader at a global hotel group explains how culture, leadership and technology are shaping the employee experience across international operations.

Public contracts to favour firms that deliver jobs and apprenticeships

UK firms bidding for public contracts must now show how they will create jobs, apprenticeships and local economic value under new government rules.

Revealed: Women sell themselves £9,000 short before they even apply for jobs

British women are applying for lower-paid roles and setting lower salary expectations than men, new figures reveal.

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.
- Advertisement -

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

Must read

Simon Blake: A focus on equity and wellbeing will help retain top talent during ‘The Great Resignation’

"A job that contributes to our wellbeing is about purpose, trust, autonomy, and personal relationships."

Anna Pinkerton: Starvation of the self

Corporations, both in the public and private sectors, are consistently puzzled by their staff sickness and losses, whilst ignoring the core problem. Anna Pinkerton talks about how kindness in corporations takes courage, but is long overdue.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you