Majority of companies fail to tailor employee benefits to demographics

-

In a recent study conducted by Towergate Health & Protection, it has been revealed that a staggering 75 percent of companies do not tailor their employee benefits to different demographics within their workforce.

This comes in stark contrast to the fact that 61 percent of these same companies report receiving requests from their staff for demographic-specific wellbeing support, including considerations such as gender or age.

The failure to align health and wellbeing support with the diverse needs of employees poses a potential risk for employers.

Benefits that are not customised to specific demographics may be perceived as irrelevant, leading to undervaluation and underutilisation. Consequently, this oversight could impact recruitment, retention, productivity, and absenteeism rates within the company.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Why are employers not tailoring benefits?

A primary obstacle identified by employers for not tailoring benefits to demographics is the perceived complexity of such an endeavour. Nearly half (48%) of the surveyed companies acknowledged this challenge, even though they expressed a desire to provide benefits in a more targeted manner.

One effective approach suggested by experts involves considering the life stages and unique needs of employees within different demographics. For instance, analysing factors such as age and gender can help guide the selection of benefits that are most relevant, such as support for fitness, fertility, menopause, or heart health.

Debra Clark, Head of Wellbeing at Towergate Health & Protection, emphasised the importance of recognising patterns within demographic profiles. She stated, “While everyone is different, there are definite patterns surrounding demographic profiles, which can help employers to offer the right benefits at the right time. Age and gender demographics are a starting point. There is then a sliding scale of more in-depth analysis of the likely requirements of each individual.”

A targetted approach

The research also indicated that only a quarter (25%) of employers target benefits based on age, lifestyle, and risk factors. Health and wellbeing support based on risk factors involves assessing the likelihood of individuals developing certain health conditions, such as diabetes. This targeted approach allows employers to implement preventive and supportive measures tailored to specific needs.

Towergate’s study revealed that the most common method for risk profiling is through employee-completed questionnaires on the risk of serious illness, employed by 36 percent of companies. Additionally, 27 percent of companies conduct questionnaires on weight and fitness, while 26 percent offer more in-depth medical assessments of the risk of serious illness.

Debra Clark emphasised, “The more targeted health and wellbeing support is, the more it will benefit the individual and, therefore, the company with a greater return on investment. Making support more specific to the individual makes employee benefits more highly valued, utilised, and cost-effective, as the money is spent where it will have the most impact.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Craig Burton: Why does mental health first aid matter?

What can business and HR leaders do to avoid the disastrous consequences of their workforce's mental health?

Peta Fry: Organisational Design – aligning your business

Having weathered the last few years, a number of...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you