HRreview Header

Assistance programmes may lose tax-exempt status

Employers may soon find it more expensive to provide Employee Assistance Programmes (EAPs) after government advisors recommended they are stripped of tax relief.

Presenting a report to the Chancellor on the tax treatment of various benefits, the Office for Tax Simplification said that while other benefits such as childcare and cycle-to-work schemes should remain tax exempt, EAPs should lose their relief and be treated as a taxable benefit. The report argued that the administration required for the tax relief was out of proportion to the relatively small sums involved.

A decision by the Chancellor is expected in the budget speech next week.

Responding to the threatened move, the UK Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA) claimed that the report had misinterpreted the true nature of EAPs.

“An Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) is a strategic intervention and valuable organisational tool that addresses team and individual performance and supports wellbeing in the workplace,” said chairman David Smith.

“Given the unique role that EAPs have in the workplace they should not be regarded as employee benefits and therefore should not be classified as such when it comes to taxation or tax relief. In this regard, the UK Employee Assistance Professionals Association believe EAPs should continue to be tax exempt.”

The Chancellor is also said to be considering a new ‘de minimis’ threshold which would mean that benefits would have to be worth more than a certain level – such as £100 or £500 – before any tax relief could be claimed.

Share

Latest News

Latest Analysis

Related Articles

Woman unfairly dismissed from Marks & Spencer after disclosing pregnancy, tribunal rules

A woman who worked at Marks & Spencer’s Watford branch was unfairly dismissed after informing her employer of her pregnancy, an employment tribunal has ruled.

Administrative burden hindering retail managers’ productivity, research finds

Over half of retail managers across the UK say that repetitive administrative tasks are hindering their ability to focus on coaching and developing their teams.

Chelsea Feeney: Supreme Court decision for Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers – implications for employers

On Wednesday 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers. What does it mean?

Richard Branson on Prioritising People Over Profit

“Clients do not come first. Employees come first. If you take care of your...