Universal Jobmatch – government ignorance over job outcomes

-

websiteThe government does not know how many people are being employed as a result of its new Universal Jobmatch website, a minister has admitted.

The news comes after earlier revelations that the site has cost the taxpayer millions of pounds to set up, with other concerns about data security and the validity of job adverts featured on the site.

Employment minister Mark Hoban said more than 1.6 million job vacancies had been posted on Universal Jobmatch since it was launched in November as a replacement for the Jobcentre Plus website.

But responding to a parliamentary question, he also revealed the government had not measured how many jobs this was delivering.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Data regarding the number of job outcomes that have been achieved through the Universal Jobmatch service are not collected, and so it is not possible to provide this,” he said.

It emerged in April that £14.89m had been spent just on setting up Universal Jobmatch, with further costs on annual administration and maintenance concealed by the government for “commercially sensitive” reasons.

Labour MP Pamela Nash told Publicservice.co.uk at the time that this was an “incredible amount of money to spend on a website”, and that it was “worrying” the Department for Wok and Pensions was refusing to disclose other costs.

The site has also hit headlines after jobseekers’ details were stolen.

But the DWP has insisted Universal Jobmatch provides a “revolutionary service which transforms the way jobseekers look for work”.

According to the department more than two million have set up an account and six million job searches are made on an average day.

The government has however been accused of “forcing” people to apply for jobs online, causing huge challenges for disadvantaged people who are not able to use the internet.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Ben Stocken: What lessons can HR leaders learn from the rugby pitch?

Here, Ben Stocken shares his top tips on what business leaders can learn from the rugby pros.

Gordon Calder-Jones: Using salary sacrifice to fund company cars

Company cars were once the sole preserve of senior...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you