Majority of jobseekers would turn down a job if the interviewer gave a poor first impression

-

shutterstock_121619314

More than two thirds (70 per cent) of job seekers turn down a job if their first impression is sub-standard, according to a new study from Monster.co.uk.

The research highlights what influences first impressions with 35 per cent of interviewees saying they would not take a job if they didn’t like the reception area. The interviewer is another big factor with 50 per cent of potential employees saying they would be swayed by the interviewer’s dress sense, handshake (60 per cent) or quality of banter (58 per cent), and 51 per cent saying they would turn down a job if they were kept waiting too long in reception.

According to 59 per cent of job applicants, even the way an interviewer wears make up could negatively affect their impression of a potential employer.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers were also highly influenced by their first impressions of candidates, and the report found that job applicants have on average just 6 minutes and 25 seconds during the first meeting to impress interviewers.

Physical appearance is an issue on both sides of the interviewing table, with 70 per cent of employers saying that the way someone wears make up could impact a first impression, and more than two thirds (71 per cent) of employers saying tattoos would put them off hiring a candidate. Job seekers should dress to impress as 62 per cent say a candidate’s dress sense impacts their employability.

Corinne Sweet, organisational behaviour psychologist, explains: “We make instant assumptions about people and can judge harshly or form fantasies, based on external factors including: style, tattoos, skin colour and their accent.  These impressions can be right or wrong, but employers need to understand that employees are forming their impressions too!”

Employers rank first impressions as the second most important factor (24 per cent) when considering a hire, following only behind work experience (36 per cent) but before a candidate’s education (12 per cent).

A candidate’s timekeeping is the number one factor influencing an employer’s first impression (96 per cent) followed closely by the amount of preparation a candidate has done (93 per cent), their ability to hold eye contact (82 per cent) and their personal appearance (73 per cent).

Andrew Sumner, Managing Director of Monster.co.uk in the UK and Ireland, explains: “In a competitive and complex job market, this demonstrates how important getting the basics right is at an interview, for both parties. HR professionals need to be sensitive to how they are perceived in the first instance. This includes ensuring that every interaction a candidate has with the company is smooth; from the first emails he or she receives, right through to the pleasant welcoming experience at interview.

“Those involved in the recruitment process have to be just as attentive and engaged as they expect candidates to be, otherwise they risk missing out on the best talent.”

Latest news

Employers await clarity on employment reforms after Starmer exit

Recruitment and HR leaders have called for stability as further workplace measures remain scheduled for implementation through 2027.

Lloyds plans 1,000 AI roles as debate over jobs impact continues

The recruitment drive is adding momentum to arguments that emerging technologies may generate new skills demand rather than widespread workforce reductions.

Fake news? AI leaves workers questioning whether messages are genuine

Growing use of AI is making people more sceptical about digital communications, with many questioning whether messages are genuine.

Jobs data reliability questioned after ONS survey mistake

Concerns have emerged over the quality of upcoming labour market figures after a survey error resulted in more than 1,000 interviews being missed.
- Advertisement -

Sarah Williams: Beyond the traditional interview – redesigning hiring for neurodivergent talent

Neuroinclusive hiring is often treated as a specialist initiative, when it is a fundamentally a capability issue.

Recruitment firms caught up in rise in illegal working penalties

Increased enforcement activity has seen staffing businesses appear on Home Office penalty lists, prompting renewed focus on hiring compliance.

Must read

Office Drama: When does HR need to step in?

The reality is that disagreements that arise in the workplace are often between highly competent individuals and the consequences can have a far reaching impact on the business as well as the mental health of those involved.

Helen Burgess: Sexual harassment at work

The recent allegations of harassment raised by the Williams’ former PA and house manager and claims that the army needs to do more to stamp it out have brought to the fore discussions on sexual harassment in the workplace.  So what are the implications for ’ordinary’ employers?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you