HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

How valuable are academic qualifications in the workplace?

-

Approximately one-third (33%) of British professionals do not believe that studying for professional qualifications is worth the effort.

This is according to a recent report into the value of professional qualifications by CoursesOnline.

However, 67 percent did report that the time spent on their qualifications was a worthy endeavour.

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

How does opinion change across job sectors?

The opinion on how valuable their qualifications are varied considerably across sectors.

The sectors that felt that the qualifications were most worthwhile were as follows:

  1. Social Work – 90% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were worth the effort
  2. Teaching & Education – 87% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were worth the effort
  3. Law – 85% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were worth the effort

On the other hand, the industries that felt the qualifications were least worth it were:

  1. Energy & Utilities – 63% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were not worth the effort
  2. Creative Arts & Design – 62% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were not worth the effort
  3. Recruitment & HR – 60% of respondents felt that professional qualifications were not worth the effort

 

What does this mean for training and recruitment?

When asked ‘What is your preferred source of learning for knowledge that is valuable to your job?’ the most popular response was on-the-job learning (36%).

Learning approaches that are tailored to the specific needs of those looking to learn are most popular.

“The learning material provided to see learners through the qualification process can’t afford to be generic – those studying need real-world examples as to how what they learn is applicable to their day-to-day work,” says General Manager of CoursesOnline, Sarah-Jane McQueen.

 

There is still support for the qualifications process

Two-thirds of respondents argued in favour of the qualifications process.

Also, a sizable minority of respondents (18%) were held back from getting the role that they wanted due to their lack of qualifications.

Nearly half of respondents (49%) believed that their level of qualification helped them to get the career role that they wanted.

A trainee nurse from North London, Kacie, studied for an Access to HE Diploma Health with the Open Study College and found what she learned to be a “tremendous help”, with the assignments that made up her qualification “forming the basis of tasks and papers I’m working on now”. In Kacie’s case, her studying flowed smoothly into her career in the medical field, and in her opinion “makes me a more attractive candidate to anyone hiring”.

Similarly, Digital Marketing Executive for Imaginarie, Annie, highlights how her time studying provided her more than just her degree in textiles as this is “something that not every industry is looking for.”

Striking the balance between receiving the appropriate academic training and receiving tailored and specific on-the-job learning may curve the effects of the skills crisis being felt by employers.

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Robert Leeming: Atmosphere and analytics are the future of innovation in HR

Innovation in HR is crucial as an innovative HR department will help to produce an innovative company. Recent research, for example, has found that employers are missing out on a host of innovative ideas by not listening to their staff.

Murray Furlong: A call for compassionate performance management

Performance management is rightly experiencing a radical overhaul. The structured, one-size-fits-all process of twice-yearly reviews, often perceived by busy managers as a necessary evil, has been denounced as formulaic, backwards-focused and subjective. In its place, pioneering employers such as Deloitte* are now advocating a continuous, ‘one-size-fits-one’ approach. But there’s an opportunity to take this even further.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you