61% of leaders expect AI to displace their people

-

A recent study conducted by Orgvue, a leading organisational design and planning software platform, reveals that 82 percent of businesses are forging ahead with investments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), even as 50 percent remain unclear about its business impact and implementation strategies.

The report, titled “Human-first, machine enhanced: the role of AI in workforce transformation,” sheds light on the paradoxes within the business community regarding AI adoption.

According to the international survey, which polled 1,000 C-suite and senior decision-makers from medium and large organisations, 69 percent are confident that AI will be seamlessly integrated into core business operations by 2025.

However, 39 percent of respondents admit a lack of organisational expertise in achieving this integration. Other barriers to AI adoption include employee scepticism (36%) and a dearth of regulations governing AI use in the workplace (33%).

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite these challenges, 33 percent of organisations are set to increase their AI investments by more than 50 percent in the upcoming year.

How can you prepare for the arrival of AI?

Orgvue CEO, Oliver Shaw, commented on the findings, noting, “There’s a dichotomy between the need for business leaders to prepare for AI entering the workforce, their desire for change, and the organisation’s ability to make this transformation a reality.”

The research highlights that 61 percent of respondents expect AI to replace people within their organisations, and 41 percent believe AI will completely disrupt their industries. Paradoxically, 69 percent anticipate AI being the primary driver of workforce transformation over the next three years, while 48 percent are unsure about managing AI developments to optimize its use.

Shaw expressed concern about the gap in understanding, saying, “This gap in thinking perhaps stems from a lack of clarity on exactly how AI will impact both businesses and their workforces – indeed the research indicates spending so far is more of a gold rush than a carefully plotted journey. This will also make managing the transformation all the harder.”

While business leaders express optimism (79%) about AI’s potential for growth and productivity, 70 percent feel a responsibility to protect the workforce from redundancies before embracing AI. Furthermore, 78 percent believe human intervention is crucial to preventing negative outcomes from AI, prompting 80 percent to plan reskilling initiatives for employees.

Arm yourself with a better understanding

Shaw emphasised the need for a balanced approach, stating, “CEOs should arm themselves with a better understanding of how AI will truly impact the work their people do today and the skills their organisation has, as well as how this may change over time.” He concluded by highlighting the importance of bridging the gap in perspective between organisational leaders and those responsible for implementation to avoid derailing long-term plans for business change.

In addition, 78 percent of surveyed leaders are calling for stricter government regulations, with 54 percent expressing concerns that current regulations have not kept pace with the rapid investment in AI. A significant majority, 70 percent, believe AI should be regulated immediately. The report underlines the urgent need for organisations and governments to address these concerns to ensure a smooth and responsible integration of AI in the business landscape.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

Fit for Work: Weekend warrior? You can still reap the health benefits

Weekend exercise can still improve long-term health, even for people who struggle to fit physical activity into the working week.

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.
- Advertisement -

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Must read

Andrew Hulbert: A Case Study – Implementing an employee engagement strategy to aid start-up

Andrew Hulbert from Pareto Facilities Management discusses how his company has achieved an effective and successful employee engagement strategy using ‘Pareto personality’.

James Rowell: Turning expense management into a workforce advantage

Expense management rarely makes the priority list when organisations talk about workforce optimisation. Yet it has a direct impact on employee satisfaction.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you